Stonecipher v. Tewalt et al
| Matthew Stonecipher |
| Director IDOC Josh Tewalt, Corizion Medical Services, Centurion Medical, Siegert, Migliori, April Dawson and Summer |
| 1:2022cv00415 |
| September 30, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Idaho |
| David C Nye |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER of Conditional Filing - caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (lm)
|
| Filing 4 MOTION for Emergency Preliminary Injunctive Relief (Imminent Danger) by Plaintiff Matthew Stonecipher. Responses due by 10/21/2022 (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Matthew Stonecipher in Support of Motion for Preliminary Injunction, #2 Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion, #3 Proposed Order)(lm) |
| Filing 3 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Matthew Stonecipher. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Fax Cover Sheet)(lm) |
| Filing 2 Statement of Prisoner Trust Fund Account, This is a sealed document. re #1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Matthew Stonecipher. (Attachments: #1 Account Summary)(lm) |
| Filing 1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Matthew Stonecipher. Responses due by 10/21/2022 (lm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
