Thomas v. Wood River Drilling and Pump, Inc., et al.
Kevin Thomas |
Wood River Drilling and Pump, Inc. and Brandon Freeman |
1:2022cv00423 |
October 7, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Idaho |
Raymond Edward Patricco |
Labor: Fair Standards |
29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 DOCKET ENTRY ORDER: In light of Defendants' #14 Renewed Motion to Dismiss and #15 Supporting Memorandum specific to Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that (i) Defendants' #11 Motion to Dismiss, and (ii) Defendants' #13 Motion to Dismiss are DENIED AS MOOT. Signed by Judge Raymond E. Patricco, Jr. (dg) |
Filing 15 MEMORANDUM in Support re #14 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Brandon Freeman, Wood River Drilling and Pump, Inc..(Worst, Madison) |
Filing 14 MOTION to Dismiss Madison Jane Worst appearing for Defendants Brandon Freeman, Wood River Drilling and Pump, Inc.. Responses due by 12/22/2022 (Worst, Madison) |
Filing 13 MOTION to Dismiss Amended Complaint Madison Jane Worst appearing for Defendants Brandon Freeman, Wood River Drilling and Pump, Inc.. Responses due by 12/21/2022 (Worst, Madison) |
Filing 12 AMENDED COMPLAINT -- First Amended Complaint against Brandon Freeman, Wood River Drilling and Pump, Inc., filed by Kevin Thomas. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1- Redline FAC)(Qualls, Colby) |
Filing 11 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim Madison Jane Worst appearing for Defendants Brandon Freeman, Wood River Drilling and Pump, Inc.. Responses due by 11/25/2022 (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support Memorandum in Support of Motion to Dismiss)(Worst, Madison) |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Assignment to Magistrate Judge and Requirement for Consent sent to counsel for Brandon Freeman, Kevin Thomas, Wood River Drilling and Pump, Inc. re #8 Notice of Appearance, #7 Notice of Appearance, #9 Notice of Appearance Consent/Objection to Magistrate due by 12/27/2022. (ac) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Madison Jane Worst on behalf of All Defendants (Worst, Madison) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Taylor June Long on behalf of All Defendants (Long, Taylor) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Richard J Worst on behalf of All Defendants (Worst, Richard) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Kevin Thomas. Wood River Drilling and Pump, Inc. served on 10/19/2022, answer due 11/9/2022. (Johnson, Charles) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Kevin Thomas. Brandon Freeman served on 10/13/2022, answer due 11/3/2022. (Johnson, Charles) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (Print attached Summons for service.) (Attachments: #1 Summons for Wood River Drilling and Pump)(jd) |
Filing 3 DOCKET ENTRY ORDER approving #2 Motion for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of attorney Colby Qualls for Kevin Thomas Per Local Rule 83.4(e), out-of-state counsel shall immediately register for ECF. (Notice sent to CM/ECF Registration Clerk) (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (jd) |
Filing 2 MOTION FOR PRO HAC VICE APPEARANCE by Colby Qualls. ( Filing fee $ 250 receipt number AIDDC-2461719.)Charles Alan Johnson appearing for Plaintiff Kevin Thomas. Responses due by 10/28/2022 (Johnson, Charles) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AIDDC-2461709.), filed by Kevin Thomas. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons)(Johnson, Charles) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.