Godfrey v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Candace Dawn Godfrey |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| 1:2022cv00443 |
| October 24, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Idaho |
| Debora K Grasham |
| B Lynn Winmill |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER- IT IS ORDERED: ALL MATTERS in the above case are referred to United States Magistrate Judge Debora K. Grasham. Judge Grasham is directed to conduct all necessary and proper proceedings pertaining thereto.If the matter is a non-dispositive motion, Judge Grasham is directed to enter an appropriate order as to disposition. A party contending the order is clearly erroneous or contrary to law shall file written objections with the court within fourteen (14) days. Signed by Judge B Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (ac)
|
| The 21 day deadline has expired. Case has been reassigned to a District Judge. No more notice of assignment will be sent out. Consent deadline(s) termed. (km) |
| DOCKET ENTRY NOTICE of Case Number Change, Case reassigned to Judge B Lynn Winmill for all further proceedings. US Magistrate Judge Debora K Grasham no longer assigned to case. Please use this case number on all future pleadings, 1:22-cv-00443-BLW (km) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Assignment to Magistrate Judge and Requirement for Consent sent to counsel for Commissioner of Social Security, Candace Dawn Godfrey re #1 Petition for Review. Consent/Objection to Magistrate due by 11/15/2022. (ac) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER of Conditional Filing - caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (ac)
|
| Filing 4 PROCEDURAL ORDER SOCIAL SECURITY (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (ac) |
| Filing 3 Statement of Social Security Number by Candace Dawn Godfrey This is a sealed document.. (Parkinson, Brad) |
| Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis Brad D Parkinson appearing for Petitioner Candace Dawn Godfrey. Responses due by 11/14/2022 (Parkinson, Brad) |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR REVIEW , filed by Candace Dawn Godfrey. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 Proposed Summons, #4 Proposed Summons)(Parkinson, Brad) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Godfrey v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Candace Dawn Godfrey | |
| Represented By: | Brad D Parkinson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Commissioner of Social Security | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
