Davis v. Bausch et al
| Jacob Stephen Davis |
| Kim Bausch, Chad Page and John & Jane Does |
| 1:2022cv00507 |
| December 16, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Idaho |
| David C Nye |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER of Conditional Filing - caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (swk)
|
| Filing 4 Motion for Appointment of Counsel by Plaintiff Jacob Stephen Davis. Responses due by 1/6/2023 (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support)(swk) |
| Filing 3 COMPLAINT against Kim Bausch, John & Jane Does, Chad Page, filed by Jacob Stephen Davis. (Attachments: #1 Attachment Exhaustion, #2 Attachment Exhaustion (cont.), #3 Attachment Exhaustion (cont.2), #4 Attachment Exhaustion (cont. 3), #5 Proposed Class Action Certification, #6 Proposed Order to Show Cause, #7 Proposed Summons, #8 eFile Cover Sheet 1 of 5, #9 eFile Cover Sheet 2 of 5, #10 eFile Cover Sheet 3 of 5, #11 eFile Cover Sheet 4 of 5, #12 eFile Cover Sheet 5 of 5)(swk) |
| Filing 2 Statement of Prisoner Trust Fund Account, This is a sealed document. re #1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Jacob Stephen Davis. (swk) |
| Filing 1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Jacob Stephen Davis. (swk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
