De Laloe v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
| Megan Ann De Laloe |
| Commissioner of Social Security Administration |
| 1:2023cv00027 |
| January 19, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Idaho |
| Raymond Edward Patricco |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 27, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
NOTICE of Appearance by Christine Gealy England on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security Administration (England, Christine)
|
|
Filing 10
NOTICE of Appearance by Edmund (Jack) Darcher on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security Administration (Darcher, Edmund)
|
|
Filing 9
ALL PARTIES HAVE CONSENTED TO PROCEED BEFORE A US MAGISTRATE JUDGE(alw)
|
|
Filing 8
DOCKET ENTRY NOTICE - Notice of Filing of Complaint seeking review under 42 U.S.C. 405(g)- caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (alw)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER GRANTING IFP APPLICATION. Plaintiffs In Forma PauperisApplication (Dkt. #3 ) is GRANTED and this action shall proceed without the payment of the filing fee. Signed by Judge Raymond Edward Patricco, Jr. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (alw)
|
|
Filing 6
NOTICE of Assignment to Magistrate Judge and Requirement for Consent sent to counsel for Megan Ann De Laloe. Consent/Objection to Magistrate due by 2/10/2023. (alw)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER of Conditional Filing - caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (alw)
|
|
Filing 4
PROCEDURAL ORDER SOCIAL SECURITY. Signed by Judge Raymond Edward Patricco, Jr. ((alw)
|
|
Filing 3
APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis Brad D Parkinson appearing for Petitioner Megan Ann De Laloe. Responses due by 2/10/2023 (Parkinson, Brad)
|
|
CORRECTIVE ENTRY - Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis was filed incorrectly in this case. Please refile using the proper event under Motion category. (alw)
|
|
Filing 2
Statement of Social Security Number by Megan Ann De Laloe This is a sealed document.. (Parkinson, Brad)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT FOR REVIEW OF SOCIAL SECURITY , filed by Megan Ann De Laloe. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis)(Parkinson, Brad)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: De Laloe v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Megan Ann De Laloe | |
| Represented By: | Brad D Parkinson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Commissioner of Social Security Administration | |
| Represented By: | Christine Gealy England |
| Represented By: | Edmund (Jack) Darcher |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
