Alaniz v. Jerome County Jail et al
| Felix L Alaniz |
| Jerome County Jail and Jerome County Sheriff Dept |
| 1:2023cv00118 |
| March 22, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Idaho |
| David C Nye |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER Directing Monthly Payments be made from Prison Account of Felix Alaniz. Motions terminated: #1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Felix L Alaniz (Notice sent to Finance). Signed by Judge David C. Nye. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (hs)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER of Conditional Filing - caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (swk)
|
| Filing 3 PRISONER COMPLAINT against Jerome County Jail, Jerome County Sheriff Dept, filed by Felix L Alaniz.(swk) |
| Filing 2 Statement of Prisoner Trust Fund Account, This is a sealed document. re #1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Felix L Alaniz. (Attachments: #1 Accounting of Prisoner Trust)(swk) |
| Filing 1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Felix L Alaniz. Responses due by 4/12/2023 (swk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
