Padilla v. Tewalt, et al.
| Omar Padilla |
| Director IDOC Josh Tewalt, Judge B. Lynn Winmill, Judge David C. Nye, Chad Page, Amanda Gentry, Mark Kubinski, Rachael Altig and Warden Richardson |
| 1:2023cv00184 |
| April 20, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Idaho |
| John C Coughenour |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 11, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Receipt of Order and of Instructions for Obtaining Procedural Guidance and Notice of Intent to Proceed, by Omar Padilla (Attachments: #1 eFile Cover Sheet)(hs) |
| Filing 4 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Omar Padilla. (Attachments: #1 eFile Cover Sheet)(ac) |
| Filing 3 Plaintiff's Motion to Disqualify Judge B. Lynn Winmill, and NOTICE of Change of Address by Omar Padilla (Attachments: #1 eFile Cover Sheet)(ac) |
Filing 2
ORDER Directing Monthly Payments be made from Prison Account of Omar Padilla. Motions terminated: (Notice sent to Finance). Signed by Judge B Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (jd) Order was mailed to Josh Tewalt.
|
|
Filing 1
ORDER entered in 1:21-cv-00409-BLW re: severing. Signed by Judge B Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (jd)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
