Peterson v. FedEx Ground Package System, Inc
Mark B. Peterson |
FedEx Ground Package System, Inc |
1:2023cv00214 |
May 1, 2023 |
U.S. District Court for the District of Idaho |
Debora K Grasham |
Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 8, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Filing 12 DISCOVERY PLAN by FedEx Ground Package System, Inc . (Scanlan, Kevin) |
Filing 11 SCHEDULING CONFERENCE FORM - LITIGATION PLAN by FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. (Scanlan, Kevin) |
Filing 10 DOCKET ENTRY ORDER approving dkt. #8 and dkt. #9 Motion for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of attorney Byron A. Bowles,Joy V. Fears for FedEx Ground Package System, Inc Per Local Rule 83.4(e), out-of-state counsel shall immediately register for ECF. (Notice sent to CM/ECF Registration Clerk); (Notice sent to CM/ECF Registration Clerk) (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (ac) |
Filing 9 MOTION FOR PRO HAC VICE APPEARANCE by Joy V. Fears. ( Filing fee $ 250 receipt number AIDDC-2565244.)Kevin J Scanlan appearing for Defendant FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. Responses due by 5/30/2023 (Scanlan, Kevin) |
Filing 8 MOTION FOR PRO HAC VICE APPEARANCE by Byron A. Bowles Jr.. ( Filing fee $ 250 receipt number AIDDC-2565221.)Kevin J Scanlan appearing for Defendant FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. Responses due by 5/30/2023 (Scanlan, Kevin) |
Filing 7 LITIGATION ORDER AND NOTICE OF TELEPHONIC SCHEDULING CONFERENCE - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AS FOLLOWS: The Court will conduct a Telephonic Scheduling Conference on June 15, 2023, at 11:00 AM mountain time, for purpose of confirming the deadlines proposed by the parties in the joint Litigation Plan. On or before June 8, 2023, the parties must file with the Court the Joint Litigation Plan and Discovery Plan. Signed by US Magistrate Judge Debora K Grasham. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (ac) |
Filing 6 Defendant's ANSWER to Complaint by FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.(Scanlan, Kevin) |
Filing 5 Docket entry only - CONSENT to Magistrate Judge filed. (hs) |
Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Mark B. Peterson. (Holzer, Kurt) |
Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by FedEx Ground Package System, Inc identifying Corporate Parent FedEx Corporation for FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. (Scanlan, Kevin) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Assignment to Magistrate Judge and Requirement for Consent sent to counsel for FedEx Ground Package System, Inc, Mark B. Peterson Consent/Objection to Magistrate due by 7/3/2023. (ac) |
NOTICE: Pursuant to FRCP 7.1 you are required to file a Corporate Disclosure Statement with the Clerk's Office. You can do this by choosing the category Other Documents, then select Corporate Disclosure Statement. (ac) |
RETURN OF SERVICE/PROCESS ASSUMED EXECUTED - FedEx Ground Package System, Inc served on 5/1/2023. (no service document on file, service assumed for internal reporting purpose only) (ac) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by FedEx Ground Package System, Inc from Ada County District Court, case number CV01-23-05561.(Filing fee $402 receipt numberAIDDC-2560662.), filed by FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit iCourt Docket, #2 Exhibit Civil Cover Sheet)(Scanlan, Kevin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.