Collins v. Valley et al
| Michael A Collins |
| Warden Valley, Sargent Barrows, Brad Little, Corporal Noble, Corporal Tayler, Officer Huarta, Nurse Patchet, Officer Salazar, Sargent Quin, Officer Storm and Idaho Supreme Court |
| 1:2023cv00256 |
| May 22, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Idaho |
| Raymond Edward Patricco |
| B Lynn Winmill |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge B Lynn Winmill for all further proceedings. US Magistrate Judge Raymond Edward Patricco, Jr no longer assigned to case. Signed by US Magistrate Judge Raymond Edward Patricco, Jr. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (jd)
|
| Filing 4 Statement of Prisoner Trust Fund Account, This is a sealed document. by Michael A Collins. (jd) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER of Conditional Filing - caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (swk)
|
| Filing 2 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Michael A Collins. (Attachments: #1 eFile Cover Sheet)(swk) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE of Application for Writ by Michael A Collins (swk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
