Electronic Controls Company et al v. Emergency Technology, Inc
Electronic Controls Company and Emergency Technology, Inc. d/b/a Soundoff Signal |
Emergency Technology, Inc. d/b/a Soundoff Signal A Michigan Corporation doing business as Soundoff Signal |
1:2023cv00311 |
June 30, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Idaho |
Amanda K Brailsford |
Trademark |
15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 25, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 MOTION to Dismiss Or In The Alternative To Transfer Venue George Thomas Williams, III appearing for Defendant Emergency Technology, Inc. d/b/a Soundoff Signal. Responses due by 9/15/2023 (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Affidavit Baker, #3 Affidavit Esshaki, #4 Affidavit Hayes, #5 Affidavit Nyeholt, #6 Affidavit Whitehead)(Williams, George) |
Filing 16 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Emergency Technology, Inc. d/b/a Soundoff Signal. (Williams, George) |
Filing 15 DECLARATION of Service of Summons and Complaint filed by Electronic Controls Company . (Hancock, Nicole) |
Filing 14 DOCKET TEXT NOTICE RESETTING Hearing: Due to the extension of time to answer complaint, the Telephonic Scheduling Conference is RESET for 9/27/2023 10:00 AM. On or before September 20, 2023, the parties must file with the Court the joint Litigation Plan and Discovery Plan. Plaintiff must initiate the conference call by placing it to (208) 334-9215 and must have all appropriate parties on the line. (kt) |
Filing 13 ORDER ON JOINT STIPULATION OF EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO ANSWER PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT - Upon due consideration of the stipulation by the Court, the stipulation is APPROVED. The deadline for Defendant to answer or otherwise plead in response to the complaint is extended to August 25, 2023. Signed by Judge Amanda K Brailsford. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (lm) |
Filing 12 STIPULATION re #1 Complaint JOINT STIPULATION OF EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO ANSWER PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT by Emergency Technology, Inc. d/b/a Soundoff Signal. (Williams, George) |
Filing 11 DOCKET ENTRY ORDER APPROVING (Dkt. #10 ) Motion for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of attorney G. Thomas Williams for Emergency Technology, Inc. d/b/a Soundoff Signal Per Local Rule 83.4(e), out-of-state counsel shall immediately register for ECF. (Notice sent to CM/ECF Registration Clerk) (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (lm) |
Filing 10 MOTION FOR PRO HAC VICE APPEARANCE by G. Thomas Williams. ( Filing fee $ 250 receipt number AIDDC-2601537.)Carsten A Peterson appearing for Defendant Emergency Technology, Inc. d/b/a Soundoff Signal. Responses due by 8/10/2023 (Peterson, Carsten) |
Filing 9 LITIGATION ORDER AND NOTICE OF TELEPHONIC SCHEDULING CONFERENCE - The Court will conduct a telephonic scheduling conference on August 17, 2023, at 10:30 a.m. mountain time (Boise chambers), for the purpose of confirming the deadlines proposed by the parties in the joint Litigation Plan. On or before August 10, 2023, the parties must file with the Court the joint Litigation Plan and Discovery Plan Signed by Judge Amanda K Brailsford. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (lm) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Availability of Magistrate Judge and Requirement for Consent sent to counsel for Electronic Controls Company, Emergency Technology, Inc. d/b/a Soundoff Signal re #7 Notice of Appearance, #1 Complaint Consent/Objection to Magistrate due by 9/18/2023. (lm) |
NOTICE: Pursuant to FRCP 7.1 Emergency Technology, Inc are required to file a Corporate Disclosure Statement with the Clerk's Office. You can do this by choosing the category Other Documents, then select Corporate Disclosure Statement. (lm) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Carsten A Peterson on behalf of Emergency Technology, Inc. d/b/a Soundoff Signal (Peterson, Carsten) |
Filing 6 DOCKET ENTRY ORDER approving (Dkt. #5 ) Motion for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of attorney Steven T Lovett for Electronic Controls Company Per Local Rule 83.4(e), out-of-state counsel shall immediately register for ECF. (Notice sent to CM/ECF Registration Clerk) (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (lm) |
Filing 5 MOTION FOR PRO HAC VICE APPEARANCE by Steven T. Lovett. ( Filing fee $ 250 receipt number AIDDC-2592875.)Nicole C Hancock appearing for Plaintiff Electronic Controls Company. Responses due by 7/24/2023 (Hancock, Nicole) |
Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Electronic Controls Company. (Hancock, Nicole) |
Filing 3 SUPPLEMENT by Plaintiff Electronic Controls Company re #1 Complaint . (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Registration, #2 Exhibit B - Backup Alarm -SoundOff Signal, #3 Exhibit C - 500 Series ECCO, #4 Exhibit D - SoundOff Backup Alarm - Cease and Desist, #5 Exhibit E - Letter, #6 Exhibit F - Backup reverse alarm - Page Vault capture)(Hancock, Nicole) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Emergency Technology, Inc. d/b/a Soundoff Signal. (Print attached Summons for service.) (lm) |
CORRECTIVE ENTRY - The entry docket number #1 Complaint filed by Electronic Controls Company was filed with exhibits attached to the main document. The complaint is your "Main Document" and any supporting documents or exhibits need to be attached to that as "attachments" and properly labeled. DO NOT upload documents to ECF without first ensuring your exhibits are clearly marked and page number references are easily located. The filing party shall re-submit their complaint as the main document with separately attached exhibits using the ECF event "Supplement".(lm) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT and Demand for Jury Trial against Electronic Controls Company ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AIDDC-2592159.), filed by Electronic Controls Company. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Cover Sheet)(Hancock, Nicole) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Electronic Controls Company et al v. Emergency Technology, Inc | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Electronic Controls Company | |
Represented By: | Nicole C Hancock |
Represented By: | Steven T Lovett |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Emergency Technology, Inc. d/b/a Soundoff Signal | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Emergency Technology, Inc. d/b/a Soundoff Signal A Michigan Corporation doing business as Soundoff Signal | |
Represented By: | Carsten A Peterson |
Represented By: | George Thomas Williams, III |
Represented By: | Hailee Elledge |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.