Crossett v. Cox Law, et al.
| David A. Crossett |
| Cox Law, Jon Cox, Elcox Ventures and Edwina Elcox |
| 1:2023cv00419 |
| September 22, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Idaho |
| Amanda K Brailsford |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Other Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #11 MOTION to Dismiss and Joinder in Elcox Defendants' Motion to Dismiss -- by Plaintiff David A. Crossett. Responses due by 12/11/2023. (jd) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE to Pro Se Litigants of the Summary Judgment Rule Requirement re #11 MOTION to Dismiss and Joinder in Elcox Defendants' Motion to Dismiss -- (jd) |
| Filing 11 MOTION to Dismiss and Joinder in Elcox Defendants' Motion to Dismiss -- Tyler J Anderson appearing for Defendants Jon Cox, Cox Law. Responses due by 11/24/2023 (Anderson, Tyler) |
| Filing 10 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Elcox Ventures. (Duke, Keely) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Availability of Magistrate Judge and Requirement for Consent sent to counsel for Jon Cox and Cox Law re #8 Notice of Appearance Consent/Objection to Magistrate due by 12/26/2023. (km) |
| DOCKET TEXT NOTICE: Pursuant to FRCP 7.1 you are required to file a Corporate Disclosure Statement with the Clerk's Office. You can do this by choosing the category Other Documents, then select Corporate Disclosure Statement. (km) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Tyler J Anderson on behalf of Jon Cox, Cox Law (Anderson, Tyler) |
Filing 7
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED the Motion to Extend Time to Respond (Dkt. #6 ) is GRANTED. Plaintiff's response to Defendants Edwina Elcox and Elcox Ventures, PLLC's Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1) and 8(a) (Dkt. #3 ) is now due January 1, 2024. The Clerk is directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff. Signed by Judge Amanda K Brailsford. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (hs)
|
| Filing 6 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #3 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction by Plaintiff David A. Crossett. Responses due by 11/9/2023 (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(hs) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE to Pro Se Litigants of the Summary Judgment Rule Requirement re #3 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction (km) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Availability of Magistrate Judge and Requirement for Consent sent to David A. Crossett and counsel for Edwina Elcox and Elcox Ventures re #3 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction , #1 Complaint Consent/Objection to Magistrate due by 12/11/2023. (km) |
| Filing 3 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim , MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction ( Responses due by 10/30/2023)Molly Mitchell appearing for Defendants Edwina Elcox, Elcox Ventures. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Declaration of Counsel in Support, #3 Exhibit A, #4 Exhibit B, #5 Exhibit C, #6 Exhibit D)(Mitchell, Molly) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (Print attached Summons for service.) (dmv) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by David A. Crossett. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet)(dmv) |
| RECEIPT: Cash Fee Received $ 402.00, receipt # 50242 (dmv) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
