Ray et al v. Schile et al
Natasha J. Ray, Thomas Frisch, Thomas DeShazo and Jeanne DeShazo |
David Schile, Katelin E. Bartles, Benjaman V. Schile, Mitch Gardner and Ada County Sheriff |
1:2023cv00488 |
November 3, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Idaho |
Raymond Edward Patricco |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 ORDER RE: SERVICE OF PROCESS - Plaintiffs must complete one of the following actions for each Defendant by February 1, 2024: (1) serve the Defendant, (2) obtain a valid waiver of service for the Defendant, or (3) request an extension of the deadline to serve the Defendant. Failure to meet this deadline may result in the dismissal of the claims against any unserved Defendants without prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by US Magistrate Judge Raymond Edward Patricco, Jr. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (hs) |
RECEIPT: CIVIL FILING FEE Received $382.00, receipt #IDX100050478 $20.00. (jld) |
Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet re #1 Complaint filed by Jeanne DeShazo, Natasha J. Ray, Thomas Frisch, Thomas DeShazo. (km) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Ada County Sheriff, Katelin E. Bartles, Mitch Gardner, Benjaman V. Schile, David Schile, filed by Thomas DeShazo, Thomas Frisch, Jeanne DeShazo, Natasha J. Ray. (km) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.