Langworthy v. Basden, et al.
| Geneva Langworthy |
| Brent Basden, Alex Schodowski, Dave Neupert and Aurora Bearse |
| 1:2023cv00567 |
| December 15, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Idaho |
| B Lynn Winmill |
| B Lynn Winmill |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 9, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
INITIAL REVIEW ORDER BY SCREENING JUDGE - IT IS ORDERED that: Langworthy's In Forma Pauperis Application (Dkt. #1 ) is GRANTED. Langworthy's Complaint (Dkt. #2 ) is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Langworthy's Motion for E-File (Dkt. #3 ) is DENIED as moot. Signed by Senior Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (hs)
|
| Filing 5 RETURN MAIL undelivered as to Geneva Langworthy re: #4 Order of Conditional Filing (hs) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER of Conditional Filing - caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (jd)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION for E-FILE by Plaintiff Geneva Langworthy. Responses due by 1/5/2024. (jd) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Geneva Langworthy. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Cover Sheet, #3 Envelope)(jd) |
| Filing 1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Geneva Langworthy. Responses due by 1/5/2024. (jd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
