Seehawer, et al. v. United States of America, et al.
| Aaron Seehawer and Van Carlson |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and United States Customs and Border Protection |
| 1:2024cv00018 |
| January 12, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Idaho |
| Raymond Edward Patricco |
| Personal Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 8, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Aaron Seehawer, Van Carlson. United States Customs and Border Protection served on 2/14/2024, answer due 4/15/2024. (Dixon, Bradley) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Aaron Seehawer, Van Carlson. United States of America served on 2/14/2024, answer due 4/15/2024. (Dixon, Bradley) |
| Filing 3 STATUS REPORT Re: Service of Process by Van Carlson, Aaron Seehawer. (Dixon, Bradley) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (Print attached Summons for service.) (Attachments: #1 Summons for US Customs and Border Protection)(jd) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Verified Complaint against UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, United States Customs and Border Protection ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number AIDDC-2687458.), filed by Aaron Seehawer, Van Carlson. (Attachments: #1 Summons - United States of America, #2 Summons United States Customs and Border Protection, #3 Cover Sheet)(Dixon, Bradley) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
