Sorenson v. Colvin
Plaintiff: Brooke Rose Sorenson
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Case Number: 1:2024cv00584
Filed: December 5, 2024
Court: U.S. District Court for the District of Idaho
Presiding Judge: Raymond Edward Patricco
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 19, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 19, 2024 Filing 11 DOCKET TEXT NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Franco Luciano Becia appearing for Commissioner of Social Security by Attorney (Becia, Franco)
December 10, 2024 Filing 10 DOCKET TEXT NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Peter L Wucetich appearing for Commissioner of Social Security by Attorney (Wucetich, Peter)
December 9, 2024 Filing 9 ALL PARTIES HAVE CONSENTED TO PROCEED BEFORE A US MAGISTRATE JUDGE(ac)
December 9, 2024 Filing 8 DOCKET ENTRY NOTICE - Notice of Filing of Complaint seeking review under 42 U.S.C. 405(g)- re. #1 Complaint for Review of Social Security. Caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (ac)
December 9, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER GRANTING IFP APPLICATION - IT IS THEREFORE HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner's In Forma Pauperis Application (Dkt. #3 ) is GRANTED and this action shall proceed without the payment of the filing fee. Signed by US Magistrate Judge Raymond Edward Patricco, Jr. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (ac)
December 6, 2024 Filing 6 NOTICE of Assignment to Magistrate Judge and Requirement for Consent sent to counsel for Brooke Rose Sorenson re. #1 Complaint for Review of Social Security. Consent/Objection to Magistrate due by 12/27/2024. (ac)
December 6, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER of Conditional Filing - caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (ac)
December 6, 2024 Filing 4 PROCEDURAL ORDER SOCIAL SECURITY. Signed by US Magistrate Judge Raymond Edward Patricco, Jr. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (ac)
December 5, 2024 Filing 3 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis Sean Wilson appearing for Plaintiff Brooke Rose Sorenson. Responses due by 12/26/2024 (Wilson, Sean)
December 5, 2024 Filing 2 Statement of Social Security Number by Brooke Rose Sorenson This is a sealed document.. (Wilson, Sean)
December 5, 2024 Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR REVIEW OF SOCIAL SECURITY , filed by Brooke Rose Sorenson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Wilson, Sean) Modified on 12/6/2024 to update attachment as civil cover sheet (ac).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sorenson v. Colvin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Represented By: Peter L Wucetich
Represented By: Franco Luciano Becia
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Brooke Rose Sorenson
Represented By: Sean Wilson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?