Reyes, et al. v. City of Boise, et al.
| Ruby Reyes, Pearl Reyes and Norma Ochoa |
| City of Boise, Officer Brady Strodtbeck and Does 1-10 |
| 1:2025cv00608 |
| October 22, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Idaho |
| Amanda K Brailsford |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury |
| Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 10, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 22
SCHEDULING ORDER - Dispositive Motion Deadline: due by 4/16/2027. Amendment of Pleadings and Joinder of Parties: due by 6/5/2026. Alternative Dispute Resolution: Mediation shall take place by 2/19/2027. Completion of Fact Discovery: due by 2/12/2027. Signed by Judge Amanda K Brailsford. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (hs)
|
| Filing 21 DISCOVERY PLAN by Ruby Reyes . (Contreras, Christian) |
| Filing 20 DISCOVERY PLAN by City of Boise, Brady Strodtbeck . (Williams, Daniel) |
| Filing 19 DOCKET TEXT NOTICE VACATING HEARING: The Telephonic Scheduling Conference set for 3/5/2026 is VACATED. The parties shall submit discovery plans no later than 3/19/2026. (st) |
| Filing 18 SCHEDULING CONFERENCE FORM - LITIGATION PLAN by City of Boise, Brady Strodtbeck. (Williams, Daniel) |
| Filing 17 SCHEDULING CONFERENCE FORM - LITIGATION PLAN by Ruby Reyes. (Contreras, Christian) |
Filing 16
AMENDED LITIGATION ORDER AND NOTICE OF TELEPHONIC SCHEDULING CONFERENCE - Joint Litigation Plan and Discovery Plan due by 2/26/2026. Telephonic Scheduling Conference set for 3/5/2026 01:30 PM in Telephonic Hearing - Boise Chambers before Judge Amanda K Brailsford. Signed by Judge Amanda K Brailsford. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (hs)
|
| Filing 15 DECLARATION of Christian Contreras re Litigation Plan and Discovery Plan filed by Ruby Reyes . (Contreras, Christian) |
| Filing 14 MOTION to Stay Daniel E Williams appearing for Defendants City of Boise, Brady Strodtbeck. Responses due by 3/5/2026 (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)(Williams, Daniel) |
Filing 13
AMENDED LITIGATION ORDER AND NOTICE OF TELEPHONIC SCHEDULING CONFERENCE - Joint Litigation Plan and Discovery Plan due by 2/12/2026. Telephonic Scheduling Conference set for 2/19/2026 10:00 AM in Telephonic Hearing - Boise Chambers before Judge Amanda K Brailsford. Signed by Judge Amanda K Brailsford. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (hs)
|
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Daniel E Williams on behalf of All Defendants (Williams, Daniel) |
| Filing 11 DOCKET TEXT NOTICE VACATING Hearing: Video Scheduling Conference set for 1/22/2026 is hereby VACATED due to reassignment of case. (bf) |
| Filing 10 DECLINATION OF CONSENT TO A MAGISTRATE JUDGE FILED AND REASSIGNMENT OF CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Amanda K Brailsford for all further proceedings. US Magistrate Judge Raymond E. Patricco no longer assigned to case. Please use this case number on all future pleadings, 1:25-cv-00608-AKB (km) |
| Filing 9 LITIGATION ORDER AND NOTICE OF VIDEO SCHEDULING CONFERENCE - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AS FOLLOWS: The Court will conduct a video scheduling conference on 1/22/2026, 9:30 A.M. *Mountain time, for purpose of confirming the deadlines proposed by the parties in the JOINT Litigation Plan. On or before 1/15/2026, the parties must file with the Court the JOINT Litigation Plan and Discovery Plans. Signed by US Magistrate Judge Raymond E. Patricco. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (ac) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Assignment to Magistrate Judge and Declination of Consent Form sent to counsel for City of Boise, Does 1-10, Norma Ochoa, Pearl Reyes, Ruby Reyes, Brady Strodtbeck re #7 Answer to Complaint, #1 Complaint Objection to Magistrate due by 1/29/2026. (km) |
| Filing 7 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by City of Boise, Does 1-10, Brady Strodtbeck.(Judd, Erika) |
| Filing 6 DOCKET ENTRY ORDER approving #4 #5 Motion for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of attorneys Humberto M. Guizar, Christian Contreras for Norma Ochoa, Pearl Reyes, and Ruby Reyes. Per Local Rule 83.4(e), out-of-state counsel shall immediately register for ECF. (Notice sent to CM/ECF Registration Clerk) (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (hs) |
| Filing 5 MOTION FOR PRO HAC VICE APPEARANCE by Christian Contreras. ( Filing fee $ 250 receipt number AIDDC-3027502.)Jeffrey R Townsend appearing for Plaintiffs Norma Ochoa, Pearl Reyes, Ruby Reyes. Responses due by 12/24/2025 (Townsend, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 4 MOTION FOR PRO HAC VICE APPEARANCE by Humberto Guizar. ( Filing fee $ 250 receipt number AIDDC-3027488.)Jeffrey R Townsend appearing for Plaintiffs Norma Ochoa, Pearl Reyes, Ruby Reyes. Responses due by 12/24/2025 (Townsend, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 3 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Ruby Reyes. City of Boise waiver sent on 10/30/2025, answer due 12/29/2025. (Townsend, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Brady Strodtbeck. (Print attached Summons for service.) (jd) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against City of Boise and Brady Strodtbeck. Summons Issued, filed by Jeffrey Townsend on behalf of Ruby Reyes, Norma Ochoa, Pearl Reyes. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet)(jd) |
| RECEIPT: Fee Received $ 405., receipt # AIDDC-3006699 (jd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.