Crosby v. Jones
| Nicole Renee Crosby |
| Dan Jones |
| 1:2025cv00613 |
| October 24, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Idaho |
| Debora K Grasham |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 8, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Nicole Renee Crosby. Responses due by 4/29/2026 (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(ac) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Change of Address by Nicole Renee Crosby, updated as indicated. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(ac) |
| Filing 6 RETURN MAIL undelivered as to Nicole Renee Crosby re: #5 INITIAL REVIEW ORDER (hs) |
| Filing 5 INITIAL REVIEW ORDER - IT IS ORDERED: Plaintiff may not proceed. To avoid dismissal, Plaintiff must submit a second amended complaint within 21 days after entry of this Order. To avoid dismissal, Plaintiff must submit a completed in forma pauperis application within 21 days after entry of this Order. Because Plaintiff is not entitled to proceed, the Litigation Order and Notice of Telephonic Scheduling Conference (Dkt. #4 ) is VACATED. The parties need not file a joint litigation and discovery plan by December 30, 2025, and the Court will not hold a status conference on January 6, 2026. The Clerk of Court shall provide a non-prisoner in forma pauperis request to Plaintiff with her copy of this Order. Signed by US Magistrate Judge Debora K Grasham. ( Amended Complaint due by 12/31/2025.) (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (ac) (Additional attachment(s) added on 12/10/2025: #1 Exhibit) (ac). |
| Filing 4 LITIGATION ORDER AND NOTICE OF TELEPHONIC SCHEDULING CONFERENCE - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AS FOLLOWS: The Court will conduct a Telephonic Scheduling Conference on January 6, 2026, at 9:30 AM mountain time, for purpose of confirming the deadlines proposed by the parties in the joint Litigation Plan. On or before December 30, 2025, the parties must file with the Court the joint Litigation Plan and Discovery Plan. Signed by US Magistrate Judge Debora K Grasham. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (ac) |
| Filing 3 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Dan Jones, filed by Nicole Renee Crosby. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(ac) |
Filing 2
ORDER of Conditional Filing - caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (lm)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Dan Jones, filed by Nicole Renee Crosby. (Attachments: #1 Envelope, #2 Attachment)(lm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Crosby v. Jones | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Nicole Renee Crosby | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Dan Jones | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
