Mendez v. Titan Concrete and Construction et al
| Raul Mendez |
| Titan Concrete and Construction, State of Idaho Judicial Branch, Idaho Supreme Court, Richard Bevan, Nate Poppino, Idaho 4th Judicial District, Steven Hippler, James Cawthon, Cynthia Wallace, Gerald Schroeder, Adam Dingeldein, Ada County Trial Court Administrator, Ada County Clerk, Ada County Recorder, Banner Bank, Hawley Troxell, Intermountain Gas, Givens Pursley, Russell Swainston and Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani |
| 1:2026cv00516 |
| August 12, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Idaho |
| B Lynn Winmill |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 13, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
MOTION to Disqualify by Plaintiff Raul Mendez. Responses due by 10/19/2026 (Attachments: #1 Declaration in Support)(jd)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER of Conditional Filing - caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (hs)
|
|
Filing 3
MOTION for Judicial Notice by Plaintiff Raul Mendez. Responses due by 9/2/2026 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6)(hs)
|
|
Filing 2
COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Raul Mendez. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet)(hs)
|
|
Filing 1
APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Raul Mendez. Responses due by 9/2/2026 (hs)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
