Gutierrez Romero v. Knight, et al.
| Gregario Gutierrez Romero |
| Director Jason Knight, Kenneth Porter, Markwayne Mullin and Todd Blanche |
| 1:2026cv00596 |
| September 15, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Idaho |
| B Lynn Winmill |
| Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 15, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( Filing fee $ 5 receipt number AIDDC-3156506.), filed by Gregario Gutierrez Romero. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A - Affidavit of Nikki Ramirez Smith, #3 Exhibit B - Affidavit of Casey Parsons, #4 Exhibit C - Affidavit of Deena Tvinnereim, #5 Exhibit D - Tacoma Hearing Attesting to Remote Hearing Policy, #6 Exhibit E - Seattle Times Article, #7 Summons Summons of DHS Secretary Mullin, #8 Summons Summons of ICE Boise Director Porter, #9 Summons Summons of SLC ICE Director Knight, #10 Summons Summons of USAG Blanche, #11 Summons Summons for USAO Idaho)(Rourk, Jacob) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order Jacob Cameron Rourk appearing for Petitioner Gregario Gutierrez Romero. Responses due by 10/6/2026 (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support Memo in Support of TRO, #2 Affidavit Affidavit in Support of TRO)(Rourk, Jacob) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
