Silverwing at Sandpoint, LLC v. Bonner County

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit Idaho District Court Silverwing at Sandpoint, LLC v. Bonner County

Silverwing at Sandpoint, LLC v. Bonner County

Plaintiff:	Silverwing at Sandpoint, LLC
Defendant:	Bonner County
Case Number:	2:2012cv00287
Filed:	June 6, 2012
Court:	US District Court for the District of Idaho
Office:	CDA - Northern Office
County:	Bonner - Northern
Presiding Judge:	Larry M. Boyle
Presiding Judge:	Edward J. Lodge
Nature of Suit:	Land Condemnation
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
November 21, 2014	Filing 101 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER. NOW THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment 80 is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. The parties are directed to confer with one another and then submit a joint notice to the Court by 12/15/2014 as to how they desire to proceed in this action. Defendant's Motion to Bifurcate 81 is DENIED. Signed by Judge Edward J. Lodge. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (st)
September 18, 2013	Filing 71 ORDER ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION incorporating and adopting 53 Report and Recommendations; granting in part and denying in part 58 Request for Judicial Notice; denying 16 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. Signed by Judge Edward J. Lodge. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (cjm)

Date Filed

Document Text

November 21, 2014

Filing 101 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER. NOW THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment 80 is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. The parties are directed to confer with one another and then submit a joint notice to the Court by 12/15/2014 as to how they desire to proceed in this action. Defendant's Motion to Bifurcate 81 is DENIED. Signed by Judge Edward J. Lodge. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (st)

September 18, 2013

Filing 71 ORDER ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION incorporating and adopting 53 Report and Recommendations; granting in part and denying in part 58 Request for Judicial Notice; denying 16 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. Signed by Judge Edward J. Lodge. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (cjm)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Silverwing at Sandpoint, LLC v. Bonner County
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Silverwing at Sandpoint, LLC
Represented By:	Kelsey Jae Nunez
Represented By:	Debora K Kristensen
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Bonner County
Represented By:	D Scott Bauer
Represented By:	Barbara E Lichman
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?