Sabo v. Fiskars Brands, Inc.

Sabo v. Fiskars Brands, Inc.

Plaintiff:	Zeljko Sabo
Defendant:	Fiskars Brands, Inc.
Case Number:	2:2012cv00503
Filed:	October 1, 2012
Court:	US District Court for the District of Idaho
Office:	CDA - Northern Office
County:	XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge:	Candy W Dale
Nature of Suit:	Tort Product Liability
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Jury Demanded By:	Defendant

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
September 2, 2014	Filing 105 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; denying 66 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 68 Defendant's Motion to Strike; administratively denying 71 Defendant's Motion in Limine; denying 79 Defendant's Motion to Strike; denying 81 Defendant's Motion to Strike; incorporating and adopting 100 Report and Recommendations. Signed by Judge Edward J. Lodge. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (cjm)
October 28, 2013	Filing 48 ORDER incorporating and adopting 46 Report and Recommendation; granting 37 Defendant's Motion to Apply Idaho Law; granting 47 Motion for Leave to File First Amended Complaint. Plaintiff shall file his First Amended Complaint on or before 11/1/2013 and serve the same as directed by the rules. Signed by Judge Edward J. Lodge. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (cjm)

Date Filed

Document Text

September 2, 2014

Filing 105 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; denying 66 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 68 Defendant's Motion to Strike; administratively denying 71 Defendant's Motion in Limine; denying 79 Defendant's Motion to Strike; denying 81 Defendant's Motion to Strike; incorporating and adopting 100 Report and Recommendations. Signed by Judge Edward J. Lodge. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (cjm)

October 28, 2013

Filing 48 ORDER incorporating and adopting 46 Report and Recommendation; granting 37 Defendant's Motion to Apply Idaho Law; granting 47 Motion for Leave to File First Amended Complaint. Plaintiff shall file his First Amended Complaint on or before 11/1/2013 and serve the same as directed by the rules. Signed by Judge Edward J. Lodge. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (cjm)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sabo v. Fiskars Brands, Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Zeljko Sabo
Represented By:	David R Partovi
Represented By:	Paul J. Marron
Represented By:	Mark John Polland
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Fiskars Brands, Inc.
Represented By:	Robert A Anderson
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?