Swenson v. County of Kootenai et al
| Suzanne Alene Swenson |
| Joshua Studor, John Doe, Kenneth Brooks, Rocky Watson, Kootenai County Sheriffs Office, County of Kootenai, Jim Reierson, Shawn Lindblom, Barry McHugh, Scott Wayman, Jason Austin, Jonathan Brandel and Barry E Watson |
| 2:2013cv00026 |
| January 16, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of Idaho |
| CDA - Northern Office |
| Kootenai - Northern |
| Ronald E Bush |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
138
ORDER ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS The Memorandum Decision and Order and Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 114 ) shall be INCORPORATED by reference and ADOPTED by this Court. Defendant Wayman and Watson's Motions to Dismiss (Dkt. 49 ) is GRA NTED. Plaintiff's Motion to Amend Complaint (Dkt. 62 ) is DENIED. Defendants Kootenai County, Kootenai County Sheriff's Office, Watson,Lindblom, McHugh, Reierson, Studor, Brooks, Austin and Brandel's Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 70 ) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Only the excessive force claim against Defendant Lindblom shall be allowed to proceed to trial. Plaintiff's Objections (Dkt. 120 and Dkt. 129 ) are DENIED. Plaintiff's Objection regarding th e tax return disclosure (Dkt. 121 ) is GRANTED IN PART. Plaintiffs Motion for Judicial Notice and Demand for Jury Trial (Dkt. 123 and 124 ) are DENIED AS MOOT as a jury trial is set on the claim for excessive force which has not been dismissed. P laintiff's Motions to Show Cause Why Defendants Should Not be Charged, Tried and Convicted of Perjury (Dkt. 130 ) and (Dkt. 132 ) are DENIED as beyond the scope of this civil litigation. The Court will withdraw the reference on Plaintiff' s Motion to Modify Scheduling Order (Dkt. 93 ) and said Motion is GRANTED IN PART consistent with this Order. The trial set for 7/22/14 is VACATED and the trial is RESET for 9/16/14 at 9:30 a.m. at the Federal Courthouse in Coeur d' Alene, Idaho to allow for the expert discovery to be completed. Signed by Judge Edward J. Lodge. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (jp)
|
|
Filing
113
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER granting 52 Motion to Compel; denying 53 Motion to Strike; granting in part and denying in part 59 Motion to Compel; denying 74 Motion for Entry of Default; denying 90 Motion to Strike; denying 98 Motion to Compel; denying 104 Motion for Sanctions. Signed by Judge Ronald E. Bush. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (cjm)
|
|
Filing
97
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION incorporating and adopting 85 Report and Recommendations; denying 51 Plaintiff's Motion for Proof of Authority to Represent and Entry for Default Judgment. Signed by Judge Edward J. Lodge. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (cjm)
|
|
Filing
47
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS ; adopting 44 Report and Recommendations.; denying 12 Motion for Default Judgment; denying 13 Motion for Entry of Default. Signed by Judge Edward J. Lodge. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (krb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
