Long Rockwood VII, LLC et al v. Rockwood Lodge, LLC et al
| Long Rockwood VII, LLC, King Rockwood VII, LLC and Horowitz Limited Partnership VII |
| Rockwood Lodge, LLC, Rockwood Lodge II, LLC, James Frank, Gary Schneidmiller, Kevin Schneidmiller, JMF Management, LLC and John and Jane Does 1-30 |
| 2:2014cv00318 |
| August 5, 2014 |
| US District Court for the District of Idaho |
| CDA - Northern Office |
| Kootenai - Northern |
| Ronald E. Bush |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
71
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER denying 64 Motion to Amend. Signed by Judge Ronald E. Bush. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (cjs)
|
|
Filing
62
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER. For all the foregoing reasons, Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment 28 is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. Counts I and Count II, for breach of contract and failure to warn, are hereby DISMISSED, with p rejudice. The claims for fraud and fraudulent concealment (Counts III and IV) survive. Defendants' Motion to Strike the Declaration of Keith Phillips 47 is GRANTED. The Motion to Strike 48 portions of the Benton, McFarland, and Martinson Declarations is DENIED. Signed by Judge Ronald E. Bush. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (st)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
