Duncan v. USA
Joseph Edward Duncan, III |
USA |
2:2017cv00091 |
February 28, 2017 |
US District Court for the District of Idaho |
CDA - Northern Office |
Kootenai - Northern |
Edward J. Lodge |
Motions to Vacate Sentence |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 49 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioners § 2255 Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence (CV Dkts. 1 , 4 ) is DENIED.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Certificate of Appealability is DENIED. Signed by Judge Edward J. Lodge. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (jd) |
Filing 43 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER Petitioner's § 2255 Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence (CV 1 , 4 ) is DENIED IN PART and UNDER ADVISEMENT IN PART. The Petition is denied as to all claims except Claim Nine challenging the consti tutionality of the statute charged in Count Seven. Claim Nine is under advisement pending resolution of the cases under consideration by the Ninth Circuit and the United States Supreme Court. Petitioner is directed to notify the Court within 5 days o f the appellate courts ruling on the legal issue presented in Claim Nine. The Certificate of Appealability is DENIED. Signed by Judge Edward J. Lodge. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (jp) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.