Floyd v. Western Oilfields Supply Company
| Jack Floyd |
| Western Oilfields Supply Company and John Does I-X |
| 2:2019cv00464 |
| November 25, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Idaho |
| Donald W Molloy |
| David C Nye |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 7, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jack Floyd. Western Oilfields Supply Company served on 10/25/2019, answer due 11/15/2019. (Nemec, Stephen) |
| Filing 11 First MOTION to Stay re #9 Memorandum in Opposition to Motion, #10 Affidavit in Opposition to Motion Stephen Joseph Nemec appearing for Plaintiff Jack Floyd. Responses due by 2/5/2020 (Nemec, Stephen) |
| Filing 10 AFFIDAVIT in Opposition re #3 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction filed by Jack Floyd. Replies due by 1/29/2020. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Nemec, Stephen) |
| Filing 9 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re #3 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction filed by Jack Floyd. Replies due by 1/29/2020.(Nemec, Stephen) |
Filing 8
ORDER granting #6 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re #3 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction. Responses due by 1/15/2020. Signed by Judge Donald W. Molloy on 12/19/2019. (dle)
|
|
Filing 7
DOCKET ENTRY ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. This case is reassigned to Judge Donald W. Molloy from the District of Montana. Signed by Judge David C. Nye. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (st)
|
| Filing 6 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #3 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction Stephen Joseph Nemec appearing for Plaintiff Jack Floyd. Responses due by 1/3/2020 (Nemec, Stephen) |
| DOCKET ENTRY NOTICE of Case Number Change. This case has been reassigned to Judge Donald Molloy. Please use case number 2:19-cv-00464-DWM on all future pleadings. (st) |
| Filing 5 ERRATA by Defendant Western Oilfields Supply Company re #3 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction with Exhibit A attached. (Dunbar, Yvonne) |
| Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Western Oilfields Supply Company. (Dunbar, Yvonne) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction Yvonne Andrea Dunbar appearing for Defendant Western Oilfields Supply Company. Responses due by 12/23/2019 (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support of Motion to Dismiss, #2 Bastian Declaration in Support of Motion to Dismiss)(Dunbar, Yvonne) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Availability of Magistrate Judge and Requirement for Consent sent to counsel for Jack Floyd and counsel for Western Oilfields Supply Company re #1 Notice of Removal. Consent/Objection to Magistrate due by 1/27/2020. (jd) |
| NOTICE: Pursuant to FRCP 7.1 you are required to file a Corporate Disclosure Statement with the Clerk's Office. You can do this by choosing the category Other Documents, then select Corporate Disclosure Statement. (jd) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Western Oilfields Supply Company from Kootenai District Court, case number CV28-19-7311.(Filing fee $400 receipt number0976-1974621.), filed by Western Oilfields Supply Company. (Attachments: #1 State Court Docket, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 State Court Notice of Filing of Notice of Removal, #4 State Court Complaint for Damages)(Julian, Brian) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
