Williams v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Sarah Louise Williams |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| 2:2019cv00492 |
| December 12, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Idaho |
| Ronald E Bush |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 24, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
Docket entry only - CONSENT to Magistrate Judge filed. (ckh)
|
|
Filing 9
NOTICE of Assignment to Magistrate Judge and Requirement for Consent sent to counsel for Commissioner of Social Security and Sarah Louise Williams re #8 Notice of Appearance and #1 Petition for Review. Consent/Objection to Magistrate due by 4/6/2020. (ckh)
|
|
Filing 8
NOTICE of Appearance by Joanne P Rodriguez on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security (Rodriguez, Joanne)
|
|
Filing 7
NOTICE of Change of Address by Joanne P Rodriguez (Rodriguez, Joanne)
|
|
Filing 6
PROCEDURAL ORDER SOCIAL SECURITY. Signed by Judge Ronald E. Bush. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (ckh)
|
|
Filing 5
Summons Issued as to Commissioner of Social Security. (Print attached Summons for service.) (ckh)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER re #2 Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner's In Forma Pauperis Application (Dkt. #2 ) is GRANTED and this action shall proceed without the payment of the filing fee. Signed by Judge Ronald E. Bush. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (ckh)
|
|
Filing 3
Statement of Social Security Number by Sarah Louise Williams This is a sealed document.. (Jones, Mark)
|
|
Filing 2
First APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis Mark B Jones appearing for Petitioner Sarah Louise Williams. Responses due by 1/6/2020 (Jones, Mark)
|
|
CORRECTIVE ENTRY - The entry document number #1 Petition for Review filed by Sarah Louise Williams was filed without payment of the required filing fee. The filing party has five (5) days from the date of this notice to pay the fees to the Clerk of Court or to file an In Forma Pauperis Application. In addition, the filing party is required to file a Statement of Social Security Number. Both forms may be found on our website. (ckh)
|
|
Filing 1
PETITION FOR REVIEW - , filed by Sarah Louise Williams. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Jones, Mark)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Williams v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Commissioner of Social Security | |
| Represented By: | Joanne P Rodriguez |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Sarah Louise Williams | |
| Represented By: | Mark B Jones |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
