Nelson, et al. v. Kootenai County, et al.
STEPHANIE NELSON and KARL NELSON |
Kootenai County, B CLAUSEN, J DOOLEY, Kootenai County Sheriff Officers, Kootenai County Sheriff, J. Dooley, Kootenai County Sheriff Department, Deputies of the Kootenai County Sheriff Department and B. Clausen |
2:2020cv00284 |
June 10, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Idaho |
Candy W Dale |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 7, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 Docket entry only - CONSENT to Magistrate Judge filed. (jd) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Assignment to Magistrate Judge and Requirement for Consent sent to counsel for B. Clausen, Deputies of the Kootenai County Sheriff Department, J. Dooley, Kootenai County, Kootenai County Sheriff Department, Karl Nelson, Stephanie Nelson re #10 Notice of Appearance, #1 Complaint. Consent/Objection to Magistrate due by 10/5/2020. (jd) |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Peter C Erbland on behalf of All Defendants (Erbland, Peter) |
Set/Reset Hearings: Telephonic Scheduling Conference set for 10/7/2020 01:00 PM Telephonic Hearing - Boise Chambers before Judge Candy W. Dale. See Dkt. 8. (at) |
Filing 9 DISCOVERY PLAN by B. Clausen, Deputies of the Kootenai County Sheriff Department, J. Dooley, Kootenai County, Kootenai County Sheriff Department . (Attachments: #1 Litigation Plan)(Erbland, Peter) |
Filing 8 DOCKET ORDER GRANTING Motion to Extend Deadlines (Dkt. 7.) The Telephonic Scheduling Conference set for 8/11/2020 is VACATED AND RESET for 10/7/2020 at 1:00 PM - Boise Courtroom 6 before Judge Candy W. Dale. On or before 9/25/2020, the parties must file with the Court the joint Litigation Plan and Discovery Plan as directed in the Litigation Order. (Dkt. 3.) Signed by Judge Candy W. Dale. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (lat) |
Filing 7 First MOTION to Continue Telephonic Scheduling Conference, First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Litigation Plan and Discovery Plan ( Responses due by 8/12/2020)Arthur M Bistline appearing for Plaintiff Karl Nelson. (Bistline, Arthur) |
Filing 6 AMENDED DOCUMENT by Karl Nelson. Amendment to #2 Summons Issued Kootenai County Sheriff's Department. (Bistline, Arthur) |
Filing 5 AMENDED DOCUMENT by Karl Nelson. Amendment to #2 Summons Issued Kootenai County. (Bistline, Arthur) |
Filing 4 STATUS REPORT PURSUANT TO DIST. IDAHO L. RULE 4.1 by Karl Nelson. (Bistline, Arthur) |
Filing 3 LITIGATION ORDER AND NOTICE OF TELEPHONIC SCHEDULING CONFERENCE - On or before August 4, 2020, the parties must file with the Court the joint Litigation Plan and Discovery Plan. Telephonic Scheduling Conference set for 8/11/2020 11:00 AM in Telephonic Hearing - Boise Courtroom 6 before Judge Candy W. Dale. Signed by Judge Candy W. Dale. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (jd) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Deputies of the Kootenai County Sheriff Department, Kootenai County, Kootenai County Sheriff Department. (Print attached Summons for service.) (Attachments: #1 Sheriff's Department)(jd) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants against All Plaintiffs ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0976-2059526.), filed by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 Summons Summons Kootenai County, #2 Summons Summons Kootenai County Sheriff, #3 Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Bistline, Arthur) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.