Crabb v. Saul
| Christina Alexandria Crabb |
| Andrew Saul |
| 2:2020cv00446 |
| September 21, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Idaho |
| Ronald E Bush |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Christina Alexandria Crabb. Andrew Saul served on 10/30/2020, answer due 12/29/2020. (Osterhout, Karl)
|
|
Filing 13
NOTICE of Appearance by Jeffrey Eric Staples on behalf of Andrew Saul (Staples, Jeffrey)
|
|
Filing 12
NOTICE of Appearance by Joanne P Rodriguez on behalf of Andrew Saul (Rodriguez, Joanne)
|
|
Filing 11
Summons Issued as to Andrew Saul, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Print attached Summons for service.) (alw)
|
|
Filing 10
ALL PARTIES HAVE CONSENTED TO PROCEED BEFORE A US MAGISTRATE JUDGE(jp)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER GRANTING IFP STATUS. Petitioners In Forma PauperisApplication (Dkt. #2 ) is GRANTED and this action shall proceed without the payment of the filing fee. Signed by Judge Ronald E. Bush. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (alw)
|
|
Filing 8
PROCEDURAL ORDER SOCIAL SECURITY. Signed by Judge Ronald E. Bush. ((alw)
|
|
Filing 7
NOTICE of Assignment to Magistrate Judge and Requirement for Consent sent to counsel for Christina Alexandria Crabb. Consent/Objection to Magistrate due by 10/13/2020. (alw)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER of Conditional Filing - (alw)
|
|
Filing 5
DOCKET ENTRY ORDER approving #3 Motion for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of attorney Karl E. Osterhout for Christina Alexandria Crabb Per Local Rule 83.4(e), out-of-state counsel shall immediately register for ECF. (Notice sent to CM/ECF Registration Clerk) (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (alw)
|
|
Filing 4
Statement of Social Security Number by Christina Alexandria Crabb This is a sealed document.. (Bybee, Michael)
|
|
Filing 3
MOTION FOR PRO HAC VICE APPEARANCE by Karl E. Osterhout. ( Filing fee $ 250 receipt number 0976-2103995.)Michael David Bybee appearing for Plaintiff Christina Alexandria Crabb. Responses due by 10/13/2020 (Bybee, Michael)
|
|
Filing 2
APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis Michael David Bybee appearing for Plaintiff Christina Alexandria Crabb. Responses due by 10/13/2020 (Bybee, Michael)
|
|
Filing 1
PETITION FOR REVIEW - , filed by Christina Alexandria Crabb. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Bybee, Michael)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Crabb v. Saul | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Andrew Saul | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Christina Alexandria Crabb | |
| Represented By: | Michael David Bybee |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
