Boyer v. Commissioner of Social Security
Petitioner: Mary Alice Boyer
Respondent: Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number: 2:2021cv00148
Filed: April 1, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of Idaho
Presiding Judge: Candy W Dale
Referring Judge: David C Nye
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 205
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 23, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 30, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Candy W. Dale. Signed by Judge David C. Nye. (alw)
April 28, 2021 Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Lisa Goldoftas on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security (Goldoftas, Lisa)
April 28, 2021 Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Joanne P Rodriguez on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security (Rodriguez, Joanne)
April 27, 2021 The 21 day deadline has expired. Case has been reassigned to a District Judge. No more notice of assignment will be sent out. Consent deadline(s) termed. (alw)
April 27, 2021 DOCKET ENTRY NOTICE of Case Number Change, Case reassigned to Judge David C. Nye for all further proceedings. Judge Candy W. Dale no longer assigned to case. Please use this case number on all future pleadings, 2:21-cv-148-CWD (alw)
April 6, 2021 Filing 8 Summons Issued as to Commissioner of Social Security, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Print attached Summons for service.) (alw)
April 6, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge Candy W. Dale. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (alw)
April 2, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 PROCEDURAL ORDER SOCIAL SECURITY. Signed by Judge Candy W. Dale. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (jp)
April 2, 2021 Filing 5 NOTICE of Assignment to Magistrate Judge and Requirement for Consent sent to counsel for Mary Alice Boyer re #1 Petition for Review. Consent/Objection to Magistrate due by 4/23/2021. (jp)
April 2, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER of Conditional Filing - (jp)
April 1, 2021 Filing 3 First APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis Mark B Jones appearing for Petitioner Mary Alice Boyer. Responses due by 4/22/2021 (Jones, Mark)
April 1, 2021 Filing 2 Statement of Social Security Number by Mary Alice Boyer This is a sealed document.. (Jones, Mark)
April 1, 2021 Filing 1 PETITION FOR REVIEW Complaint, filed by Mary Alice Boyer. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Jones, Mark)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Boyer v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By: Joanne P Rodriguez
Represented By: Lisa Goldoftas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Mary Alice Boyer
Represented By: Mark B Jones
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?