Stimson Lumber Company v. The Coeur d'Alene Tribe
| Stimson Lumber Company |
| The Coeur d'Alene Tribe |
| 2:2022cv00367 |
| August 23, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Idaho |
| David C Nye |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 2, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 26
REPLY to Response to Motion re #20 MOTION to Dismiss or Stay filed by The Coeur d'Alene Tribe.Motion Ripe Deadline set for 12/20/2022.(Ray-Hodge, Vanessa)
|
|
Filing 25
RESPONSE to Motion re #20 MOTION to Dismiss or Stay filed by Stimson Lumber Company. Replies due by 12/19/2022.(Olson, Steven)
|
|
The 60 day deadline has expired. Case will remain with a District Judge. No more notice of availability or assignment will be sent out. Consent deadline(s) termed. (alw)
|
|
Filing 24
Docket entry only - CONSENT to Magistrate Judge filed. (alw)
|
|
Filing 23
DECLARATION of Samantha Taylor re #22 Reply to Response to Motion filed by Stimson Lumber Company . (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3)(Olson, Steven)
|
|
Filing 22
REPLY to Response to Motion re #8 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction filed by Stimson Lumber Company.Motion Ripe Deadline set for 11/21/2022.(Olson, Steven)
|
|
Filing 21
MEMORANDUM in Support re #20 MOTION to Dismiss or Stay filed by The Coeur d'Alene Tribe.(Ray-Hodge, Vanessa)
|
|
Filing 20
MOTION to Dismiss or Stay Vanessa Ray-Hodge appearing for Defendant The Coeur d'Alene Tribe. Responses due by 12/5/2022 (Ray-Hodge, Vanessa)
|
|
Filing 19
DECLARATION of Eric Van Orden re #18 Response to Motion filed by The Coeur d'Alene Tribe . (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit)(Ray-Hodge, Vanessa)
|
|
Filing 18
RESPONSE to Motion re #8 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction filed by The Coeur d'Alene Tribe. Replies due by 11/14/2022.(Ray-Hodge, Vanessa)
|
|
Set/Reset Deadlines as to #8 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction. Responses due by 10/28/2022 Replies due by 11/18/2022. (alw)
|
|
Filing 17
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Stimson Lumber Company Acceptance of Service (Johnson, Reid)
|
|
Filing 16
DOCKET ENTRY ORDER. Pursuant to the parties' notice (Dkt. #14 ), Defendant's Response to Plaintiff's Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction is due on or before October 28, 2022, and Plaintiff's Reply is due on or before November 18, 2022. Signed by Judge David C. Nye. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (bb)
|
|
Filing 15
NOTICE of Availability of Magistrate Judge and Requirement for Consent sent to counsel for Stimson Lumber Company, The Coeur d'Alene Tribe re #13 Notice of Appearance Consent/Objection to Magistrate due by 12/2/2022. (alw)
|
|
Filing 14
NOTICE by The Coeur d'Alene Tribe of Joint Briefing Schedule (Ray-Hodge, Vanessa)
|
|
Filing 13
NOTICE of Appearance by Vanessa Ray-Hodge on behalf of The Coeur d'Alene Tribe (Ray-Hodge, Vanessa)
|
|
Filing 12
WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Stimson Lumber Company. The Coeur d'Alene Tribe waiver sent on 9/12/2022, answer due 11/14/2022. (Johnson, Reid)
|
|
Filing 11
DECLARATION of Andrew Miller re #8 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction filed by Stimson Lumber Company . (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5)(Olson, Steven)
|
|
Filing 10
DECLARATION of Samantha Taylor re #8 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction filed by Stimson Lumber Company . (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5)(Olson, Steven)
|
|
Filing 9
MEMORANDUM in Support re #8 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction filed by Stimson Lumber Company.(Olson, Steven)
|
|
Filing 8
MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction Steven D. Olson appearing for Plaintiff Stimson Lumber Company. Responses due by 9/30/2022 (Olson, Steven)
|
|
Filing 7
DOCKET ENTRY ORDER approving #5 #6 Motion for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of attorney Reid G. Johnson, Steven D. Olson for Stimson Lumber Company Per Local Rule 83.4(e), out-of-state counsel shall immediately register for ECF. (Notice sent to CM/ECF Registration Clerk) (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (alw)
|
|
Filing 6
MOTION FOR PRO HAC VICE APPEARANCE by Steve D. Olson. ( Filing fee $ 250 receipt number AIDDC-2444858.)Michael James Hines appearing for Plaintiff Stimson Lumber Company. Responses due by 9/21/2022 (Hines, Michael)
|
|
Filing 5
MOTION FOR PRO HAC VICE APPEARANCE by Reid G. Johnson. ( Filing fee $ 250 receipt number AIDDC-2444849.)Michael James Hines appearing for Plaintiff Stimson Lumber Company. Responses due by 9/21/2022 (Hines, Michael)
|
|
Filing 4
Corporate Disclosure Statement by Stimson Lumber Company. (Hines, Michael)
|
|
Filing 3
Summons Issued as to The Coeur d'Alene Tribe. (Print attached Summons for service.) (alw)
|
|
Filing 2
Civil Cover Sheet re #1 Complaint filed by Stimson Lumber Company. (Hines, Michael)
|
|
CORRECTIVE ENTRY - The civil cover sheet is blank. Please fill out and refile. (alw)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against The Coeur d'Alene Tribe ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AIDDC-2440420.), filed by Stimson Lumber Company. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Cover Sheet)(Hines, Michael)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
