Murphy v. Kochava, Inc.
| Cindy Murphy, Scott Connelly, Jenny Watson and Adriana Ingram |
| Kochava, Inc. |
| 2:2023cv00058 |
| February 1, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Idaho |
| Raymond Edward Patricco |
| B Lynn Winmill |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 2, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 21
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER - IT IS ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. #14 ) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part, as follows: Plaintiffs' claims for injunctive relief are DISMISSED with leave to amend. Plaintiffs' claims under the Washington Consumer Protection Act (WCPA) and California's Unfair Competition Law (UCL) are DISMISSED with leave to amend. Defendants Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. #14 ) is DENIED in all other respects. Plaintiffs are granted leave to amend in accordance with this Order. Any such amendment shall be filed within 30 days after issuance of this Order. Signed by Judge B Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (hs)
|
|
Filing 20
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Kochava, Inc. re #19 Reply to Response to Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint (Mariam, Craig)
|
|
Filing 19
REPLY to Response to Motion re #14 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Standing filed by Kochava, Inc..Motion Ripe Deadline set for 6/8/2023.(Mariam, Craig)
|
|
Filing 18
RESPONSE to Motion re #14 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Standing filed by Scott Connelly, Adriana Ingram, Cindy Murphy, Jenny Watson. Replies due by 6/7/2023.(Ellingsen, Mark)
|
|
Filing 17
DOCKET ENTRY ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE: Having reviewed the parties' stipulation (Dkt. #16 ) and good cause appearing, it is ORDERED that Plaintiffs shall respond to Defendant's motion to dismiss (Dkt. #14 ) by May 25, 2023. Defendants reply shall be filed 14 days after the response. Signed by Judge B Lynn Winmill. (hgp)
|
|
Filing 16
STIPULATION re #14 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Standing by Scott Connelly, Adriana Ingram, Cindy Murphy, Jenny Watson. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Ellingsen, Mark)
|
|
Reset Plaintiffs' response deadline as to motion to dismiss (Dkt. #14 ) for 5/25/2023. (hgp)
|
|
Filing 15
DOCKET ENTRY ORDER: Because Plaintiffs filed an Amended Complaint (Dkt. 13) and Defendant filed a second (Dkt. 14) Motion to Dismiss, Defendant's first (Dkt. 9) Motion to Dismiss is denied as MOOT. Signed by Judge B Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (mhw))
|
|
Filing 14
Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim , MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Standing ( Responses due by 5/11/2023)Craig Joel Mariam appearing for Defendant Kochava, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support of Kochava's Motion to Dismiss FAC)(Mariam, Craig)
|
|
Filing 13
AMENDED COMPLAINT against Kochava, Inc., filed by Cindy Murphy, Scott Connelly, Jenny Watson, Adriana Ingram.(Ellingsen, Mark)
|
|
Filing 12
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge B Lynn Winmill for all further proceedings. Judge Raymond Edward Patricco, Jr no longer assigned to case. Signed by Judge Raymond Edward Patricco, Jr. (alw)
|
|
DOCKET ENTRY NOTICE of Case Number Change, Please use this case number on all future pleadings, 2:23-cv-58-BLW (alw)
|
|
Filing 11
NOTICE by Kochava, Inc. of Related Cases (Mariam, Craig)
|
|
Filing 10
Corporate Disclosure Statement by Kochava, Inc.. (Mariam, Craig)
|
|
Filing 9
Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim Craig Joel Mariam appearing for Defendant Kochava, Inc.. Responses due by 4/7/2023 (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support of Kochava's Motion to Dismiss)(Mariam, Craig)
|
|
Filing 8
DOCKET ENTRY ORDER granting #6 #7 Motion for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of attorney Michael T Houchin,Ronald A Marron for Cindy Murphy Per Local Rule 83.4(e), out-of-state counsel shall immediately register for ECF. (Notice sent to CM/ECF Registration Clerk) (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (alw)
|
|
Filing 7
MOTION FOR PRO HAC VICE APPEARANCE for Ronald Marron ( Filing fee $ 250 receipt number AIDDC-2538023.)( Responses due by 4/5/2023)Mark A Ellingsen appearing for Plaintiff Cindy Murphy. (Ellingsen, Mark) Modified on 3/15/2023 to edit docket text (alw).
|
|
Filing 6
MOTION FOR PRO HAC VICE APPEARANCE by Michael T. Houchin. ( Filing fee $ 250 receipt number AIDDC-2538016.)Mark A Ellingsen appearing for Plaintiff Cindy Murphy. Responses due by 4/5/2023 (Ellingsen, Mark)
|
|
Filing 5
DOCKET ENTRY ORDER adopting #4 Stipulation to Extend time to Respond. Defendant must respond to Plaintiff's Complaint by March 17, 2023. Signed by Judge Raymond Edward Patricco, Jr. (hsm)
|
|
Filing 4
STIPULATION to Extend Time to Respond to Initial Complaint by Kochava, Inc.. (Mariam, Craig)
|
|
Filing 3
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Cindy Murphy re #1 Complaint, #2 Summons Issued (Ellingsen, Mark)
|
|
Filing 2
Summons Issued as to Kochava, Inc.. (Print attached Summons for service.) (alw)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Kochava, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AIDDC-2515250.), filed by Cindy Murphy. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Cover Sheet)(Ellingsen, Mark)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
