Frickey v. Concora Credit Inc
Russell Anderson Frickey |
Concora Credit Inc |
2:2023cv00509 |
November 15, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Idaho |
B Lynn Winmill |
B Lynn Winmill |
Consumer Credit |
28 U.S.C. ยง 3001 Federal Debt Collection Procedures Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 4, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 RETURN MAIL undelivered as to Russell Anderson Frickey re: #3 Notice of Availability Setting Deadline filed by Concora Credit Inc, Russell Anderson Frickey (hs) |
Filing 6 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Concora Credit Inc. (Fuller, Lyle) |
Filing 5 MEMORANDUM in Support re #4 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim Or For More Definite Statement filed by Concora Credit Inc.(Fuller, Lyle) |
Filing 4 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim Or For More Definite Statement Lyle J Fuller appearing for Defendant Concora Credit Inc. Responses due by 12/13/2023 (Fuller, Lyle) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Availability of Magistrate Judge and Requirement for Consent sent to counsel for Concora Credit Inc, Russell Anderson Frickey re #1 Notice of Removal Consent/Objection to Magistrate due by 1/16/2024. (hs) |
DOCKET TEXT NOTICE: Pursuant to FRCP 7.1 you are required to file a Corporate Disclosure Statement with the Clerk's Office. You can do this by choosing the category Other Documents, then select Corporate Disclosure Statement. (hs) |
RETURN OF SERVICE/PROCESS ASSUMED EXECUTED - Concora Credit Inc served on 11/15/2023. (service assumed for internal reporting purpose only) (hs) |
Filing 2 ERRATA by Defendant Concora Credit Inc Corrected Notice of Removal. (Attachments: #1 State Court Complaint, #2 State Court Service Documents, #3 Cover Sheet)(Fuller, Lyle) (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/17/2023: #4 State Court Docket Sheet) (hs). |
CORRECTIVE ENTRY - The entry docket number #1 Notice of Removal filed by Concora Credit Inc was filed incorrectly in this case. All state court documents shall be individual attachments to the Notice of Removal. The filing party shall re-submit their correct filing as an Errata, located under Civil Events/Other Filings/Other Documents to avoid a duplicate filing fee. 1) Attach Notice of Removal as main document. 2) Attach state court complaint. 3) Attach state court service documents. 4) Attach civil cover sheet. 5) Attach any pending motions. 6) Attach any additional documents. (hs) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Concora Credit Inc from Kootenai County Magistrate Court, case number CV28-123-6877.(Filing fee $402 receipt numberAIDDC-2661064.), filed by Concora Credit Inc.(Fuller, Lyle) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Frickey v. Concora Credit Inc | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Russell Anderson Frickey | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Concora Credit Inc | |
Represented By: | Lyle J Fuller |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.