Eby v. Idaho, State of, et al

Eby v. Idaho, State of, et al

Case Number:	3:2002cv00113
Filed:	March 12, 2002
Court:	US District Court for the District of Idaho
Office:	Moscow - Central Office
Presiding Judge:	Mikel H. Williams
Nature of Suit:	Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
August 20, 2015	Filing 45 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER granting 38 Respondent's MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer; granting 41 Petitioner's MOTION for Extension of Time to File Reply. Claims One and Four of the Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corp us (Dkt. 13 ) are DENIED. Because all other claims in the Amended Petition have been dismissed, this entire action is DISMISSED with prejudice.The Court does not find its resolution of this habeas matter to be reasonably debatable, and a certificate of appealability will not issue. Signed by Judge Mikel H. Williams. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (cjs)
April 8, 2014	Filing 29 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER. IT IS ORDERED: Petitioner's Motion for Appointment of Counsel 25 is DENIED. Respondent's Motion for Partial Summary Dismissal 21 is GRANTED IN PART. Claims Two, Five, and Six of the Petition are DISMISS ED with prejudice. Petitioner shall have 21 days after entry of this Order to file a brief showing cause and prejudice to excuse the procedural default of Claim Three. Signed by Judge Mikel H. Williams. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (st)

Date Filed

Document Text

August 20, 2015

Filing 45 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER granting 38 Respondent's MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer; granting 41 Petitioner's MOTION for Extension of Time to File Reply. Claims One and Four of the Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corp us (Dkt. 13 ) are DENIED. Because all other claims in the Amended Petition have been dismissed, this entire action is DISMISSED with prejudice.The Court does not find its resolution of this habeas matter to be reasonably debatable, and a certificate of appealability will not issue. Signed by Judge Mikel H. Williams. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (cjs)

April 8, 2014

Filing 29 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER. IT IS ORDERED: Petitioner's Motion for Appointment of Counsel 25 is DENIED. Respondent's Motion for Partial Summary Dismissal 21 is GRANTED IN PART. Claims Two, Five, and Six of the Petition are DISMISS ED with prejudice. Petitioner shall have 21 days after entry of this Order to file a brief showing cause and prejudice to excuse the procedural default of Claim Three. Signed by Judge Mikel H. Williams. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (st)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Eby v. Idaho, State of, et al
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?