Carr v. Carlin

Carr v. Carlin

Petitioner:	Jody R.O. Carr
Respondent:	Carlin
Case Number:	3:2010cv00237
Filed:	May 10, 2010
Court:	US District Court for the District of Idaho
Office:	Moscow - Central Office
County:	Idaho - Central
Presiding Judge:	Larry M. Boyle
Nature of Suit:	General
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 28, 2013	Filing 75 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER denying 45 Motion for Order to Show Cause; denying 46 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 47 Motion for Reconsideration re 3 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Jody R.O. Carr ; denying 48 Motion for Hearing; denying 49 Motion to Expand the Record; granting 55 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer ; granting 61 Motion to Strike ; granting 62 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re 3 Petition for Writ of Habea s Corpus ; denying 63 Motion Objecting to Respondent's Second Motion for Extension of Time. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus 3 is DENIED and DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by Judge Edward J. Lodge. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (krb)
March 1, 2012	Filing 42 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER denying 36 Motion to Strike pet's exhibits ; granting 37 Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages; denying 39 Motion for Reconsideration ; granting in part and denying in part 15 Motion for Summary Judgment; de nying 19 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 21 Motion requesting pro-se leniency ; granting 22 Motion requesting Court hold exhibits ; denying 23 Motion for Reconsideration ; granting in part 24 Motion for Leave to File Exhibit 6000-A-1; granting 27 Motion for Extension of Time to produce evidence in support of all documents; The parties shall file any summary judgment motions on the remaining claims no later than 120 days after entry of this Order: Claims 2(b), 3(b), 4(b), 4(c), 5(a) (due process theory only), 6, 7, 8(a), 10, 13 (due process theory only), 15(b) (due process theory only), 19 (due process theory only), 24(c), 24(f), and 28(a).. Signed by Judge Edward J. Lodge. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by dks)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 28, 2013

Filing 75 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER denying 45 Motion for Order to Show Cause; denying 46 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 47 Motion for Reconsideration re 3 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Jody R.O. Carr ; denying 48 Motion for Hearing; denying 49 Motion to Expand the Record; granting 55 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer ; granting 61 Motion to Strike ; granting 62 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re 3 Petition for Writ of Habea s Corpus ; denying 63 Motion Objecting to Respondent's Second Motion for Extension of Time. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus 3 is DENIED and DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by Judge Edward J. Lodge. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (krb)

March 1, 2012

Filing 42 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER denying 36 Motion to Strike pet's exhibits ; granting 37 Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages; denying 39 Motion for Reconsideration ; granting in part and denying in part 15 Motion for Summary Judgment; de nying 19 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 21 Motion requesting pro-se leniency ; granting 22 Motion requesting Court hold exhibits ; denying 23 Motion for Reconsideration ; granting in part 24 Motion for Leave to File Exhibit 6000-A-1; granting 27 Motion for Extension of Time to produce evidence in support of all documents; The parties shall file any summary judgment motions on the remaining claims no later than 120 days after entry of this Order: Claims 2(b), 3(b), 4(b), 4(c), 5(a) (due process theory only), 6, 7, 8(a), 10, 13 (due process theory only), 15(b) (due process theory only), 19 (due process theory only), 24(c), 24(f), and 28(a).. Signed by Judge Edward J. Lodge. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by dks)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Carr v. Carlin
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Jody R.O. Carr
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Carlin
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?