Morehouse v. State of Idaho et al
Teri L Morehouse |
Thomas Houdeshell, Kenneth Alldren, Robert Quinn Davidson, Brent D Reinke, Terema Carlin, State of Idaho and Aaron Kreiger |
1:2011cv00167 |
April 20, 2011 |
US District Court for the District of Idaho |
Moscow - Central Office |
Clearwater - Central |
B. Lynn Winmill |
Employment |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 104 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER The motion for summary judgment filed by defendants (docket no. 57 ) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. The motion for summary judgment filed by plaintiff Wellock (docket no. 66 ) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. The motions to strike (docket nos. 77 , 88 & 101 ) are DENIED. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (jp) |
Filing 103 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER denying 53 Motion for Leave to File. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (krb) |
Filing 33 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER denying 26 Motion to Sever; denying as moot 28 Motion to Strike. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (cjm) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.