Heilman v. Blades
||Dennis R Heilman
||State of Idaho
||July 1, 2011
||Idaho District Court
||Moscow - Central Office
||Clearwater - Central
||Ronald E Bush
|Nature of Suit:
||Habeas Corpus (General)
|Cause of Action:
||28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
|Jury Demanded By:
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|October 19, 2018
MEMORANDUM DECISION & ORDER Petitioner's Motion for Judicial Clarification (Dkt. 41 ) is MOOT. Respondent's Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer (Dkt. 38 ) is GRANTED. Petitioner's Motions for Extension of Time to File Travers e/Reply (Dkt. 45 , 47 ) are GRANTED. Respondent's Motion for Extension of Time to File Sur-reply (Dkt. 50 ) is GRANTED. Petitioner's Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Dkt. 11 ) and this entire action are DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by Judge David C. Nye. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (jp)
|October 12, 2017
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 19 Respondent's Motion for Summary Dismissal. Claims Three, Four(a), Five(a), Six, and Twelve are dismissed with prejudice. Respondent shall file an answer to the remaining cla ims (Claims One, Two, Four(b), Five(b), Seven, Eight, Nine, Ten, Eleven, and Thirteen through Fifteen) within 90 days after entry of this Order. Signed by Judge Edward J. Lodge. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (cjs)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?