Perez et al v. Clearwater Paper Corporation
| Thomas E Perez and United States Department of Labor |
| Clearwater Paper Corporation |
| 3:2013cv00461 |
| October 23, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of Idaho |
| Moscow - Central Office |
| Nez Perce - Central |
| B. Lynn Winmill |
| Other Labor Litigation |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 651 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
37
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that Defendant Clearwater Paper Corporation's Motion for Summary Judgment 31 is DENIED. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (st)
|
|
Filing
29
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER. Motion 25 is GRANTED. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (st)
|
|
Filing
21
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER. If Clearwater continues to refuse to produce the underlying documents, the parties may again contact Court staff to set up briefing schedule on the issue of whether the probative value of the requested documents outweighs the potential burden to Clearwater to produce the information. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (st)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
