Hamell et al v. Idaho County et al
Rachelle J Hamell and Raymond R Hamell |
Idaho County, Kathy Ackerman, Mark Frei, Jim Chmelik, Skip Brandt and John/Jane Doe 1-5 |
3:2016cv00469 |
October 19, 2016 |
US District Court for the District of Idaho |
Moscow - Central Office |
Idaho - Central |
Ronald E. Bush |
Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 40 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER. NOW THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment 32 is GRANTED. The § 1983 claim is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The remaining claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Plaintiffs' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment 33 is DENIED. Signed by Judge Edward J. Lodge. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (st) |
Filing 25 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER. NOW THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: Defendants' Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings 10 is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART as stated herein. Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to File Amended Co mplaint 15 is GRANTED. Plaintiffs shall file an Amended Complaint within seven days of this Order. The parties shall submit an updated, stipulated litigation plan, within fourteen dates of the date of this Order as directed. (Dkt. 24.). Signed by Judge Edward J. Lodge. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (st) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.