Ruck v. USA
| Matt Eugene Ruck |
| USA |
| 3:2018cv00390 |
| August 31, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Idaho |
| Edward J. Lodge |
| Prisoner: Vacate Sentence |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 9, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 MOTION to Modify Briefing Schedule by Petitioner Matt Eugene Ruck. Responses due by 11/16/2018. (cjs) |
| Filing 9 MOTION to Reconsider re #8 Order, by Petitioner Matt Eugene Ruck. Responses due by 10/30/2018. (cjs) |
Filing 8
ORDER CONSOLIDATING CASES AND SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE. NOW THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: Petitioner's Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis in the Motion under 28 U.S.C. 2255 is DENIED AS MOOT. Petitioner's Motion to Consolidate #3 is GRANTED as stated herein. Case Number 3:18-cv-390-EJL shall serve as the lead case and all filing shall be done in the lead case only. Petitioner's Motion to Recuse of Disqualify Judge [4)]is DENIED. Respondent's Motion for Extension of Time #7 is GRANTED. Respondent's response to Petitioners 2255 Motion is due on or before 12/20/2018. Petitioner's reply, if any, is due on or before 1/10/2018. Signed by Judge Edward J. Lodge. Associated Cases: 3:18-cv-00390-EJL, 3:18-cv-00394-EJL, 3:18-cv-00395-EJL(caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (st)
|
| Filing 7 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #1 Motion to Vacate/Set Aside/Correct Sentence (2255) Francis Joseph Zebari appearing for Respondent USA. Responses due by 10/10/2018 (Zebari, Francis) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Francis Joseph Zebari on behalf of USA (Zebari, Francis) |
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Matt Eugene Ruck re #3 MOTION to Consolidate, #4 MOTION to Recuse or MOTION to Disqualify Judge (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter)(cjs) |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Recuse or MOTION to Disqualify Judge by Petitioner Matt Eugene Ruck. Responses due by 10/8/2018. (cjs) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Consolidate by Petitioner Matt Eugene Ruck. Responses due by 10/8/2018. (cjs) |
| Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Petitioner Matt Eugene Ruck. Responses due by 9/21/2018 (cjs) |
| Filing 1 MOTION to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence (2255) ( Criminal Action 3:15-cr-062-EJL-1.), filed by Matt Eugene Ruck. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Cover Letter)(cjs) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Ruck v. USA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: USA | |
| Represented By: | Traci Jo Whelan |
| Represented By: | Francis Joseph Zebari |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Matt Eugene Ruck | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
