Gallaher v. USA
| James Howard Gallaher and Jamie Gallaher |
| USA |
| 3:2020cv00249 |
| May 22, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Idaho |
| B Lynn Winmill |
| Prisoner: Vacate Sentence |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 3, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply Traci Jo Whelan appearing for Respondent USA. Responses due by 6/19/2020 (Whelan, Traci) |
| Filing 3 MOTION For an Order Concerning Attorney-Client Privilege Traci Jo Whelan appearing for Respondent USA. Responses due by 6/18/2020 (Whelan, Traci) |
Filing 2
NOTICE OF FILING AND ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE - The United States shall file a written response to the Petitioners motion within thirty (30) daysfrom the date of this scheduling order. The Petitioner shall have fourteen (14) days thereafter to file any reply brief. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (jd)
|
| Set Deadlines/Hearings: Case Management deadline set for 6/26/2020. (jd) |
| Filing 1 MOTION to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence (2255) ( Criminal Action 3:19-cr-00173-BLW.), filed by James Howard Gallaher. (Attachments: #1 Inmate Account Transactions)(jd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
