Lemm v. Kijakazi
Tyson William Lemm |
Kilolo Kijakazi |
3:2022cv00128 |
March 26, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Idaho |
Candy W Dale |
Debora K Grasham |
David C Nye |
Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
42 U.S.C. ยง 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Christine Gealy England on behalf of Kilolo Kijakazi (England, Christine) |
Filing 11 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Debora K Grasham. Signed by Judge David C. Nye. (alw) |
Filing 10 REQUEST FOR REASSIGNMENT TO DISTRICT JUDGE AND REASSIGNMENT OF CASE. Case reassigned to Judge David C. Nye for all further proceedings. Judge Debora K Grasham no longer assigned to case. Please use this case number on all future pleadings, 3:22-cv-128-DCN(alw) |
Filing 9 DOCKET ENTRY ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Due to the appointment of United States Magistrate Judge Debora K. Grasham, this case is hereby reassigned. Judge Candy W. Dale no longer assigned to case. Please use case number 3:22-cv-00128-DKG on all future pleadings. Signed by Judge Candy W. Dale. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (km) |
Filing 8 Summons Issued as to Kilolo Kijakazi (Print attached Summons for service.) (km) |
Filing 7 ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioners Application for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Dkt. #3 ) is GRANTED. Signed by Judge Candy W. Dale. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (km) |
Filing 6 PROCEDURAL ORDER SOCIAL SECURITY. Signed by Judge Candy W. Dale. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (jd) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Assignment to Magistrate Judge and Requirement for Consent sent to counsel for Kilolo Kijakazi and counsel for Tyson William Lemm re #1 Petition for Review. Consent/Objection to Magistrate due by 4/18/2022. (jd) |
Filing 4 ORDER of Conditional Filing - (jd) |
Filing 3 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis Paul L Clark appearing for Petitioner Tyson William Lemm. Responses due by 4/18/2022 (Clark, Paul) |
Filing 2 Statement of Social Security Number by Tyson William Lemm This is a sealed document.. (Clark, Paul) |
Filing 1 PETITION FOR REVIEW , filed by Tyson William Lemm. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Clark, Paul) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Lemm v. Kijakazi | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Tyson William Lemm | |
Represented By: | Paul L Clark |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Kilolo Kijakazi | |
Represented By: | Christine Gealy England |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.