Trappett, et al. v. Clearwater County, et al.
| Keith Trappett, Ethel Trappett, Cindy Beardin and Ethel Jackie Trappett |
| Clearwater County, Chris Goetz, Brittany Borup, Randall Caruth and I - X DOES |
| 3:2022cv00221 |
| May 24, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Idaho |
| Candy W Dale |
| P.I.: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 3, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
LITIGATION ORDER AND NOTICE OF TELEPHONIC SCHEDULING CONFERENCE - The Court will conduct a Telephonic Scheduling Conference on August 3, 2022, at 1:00 p.m. On or before July 27, 2022, the parties must file with the Court the joint Litigation Plan and Discovery Plan. Signed by Judge Candy W Dale. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (lm)
|
|
CORRECTIVE ENTRY - The entry docket number #2 Civil Cover Sheet was filed incorrectly in this case. The filing party shall re-submit a Civil Cover Sheet that is completed.(lm)
|
|
Filing 2
Civil Cover Sheet re #1 Complaint filed by Cindy Beardin, Ethel Trappett, Keith Trappett. (Starnes, Nathan)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Clearwater County, Chris Goetz, Brittany Borup, Randall Caruth, I - X DOES ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AIDDC-2398631.), filed by All Plaintiffs.(Starnes, Nathan)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
