Butterfield v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Erin Marie Butterfield |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| 3:2023cv00069 |
| February 9, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Idaho |
| Debora K Grasham |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 Denial Social Security Benefits |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 10, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Christine Gealy England on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security (England, Christine) |
| Filing 10 DOCKET ENTRY NOTICE - Notice of Filing of Complaint seeking review under 42 U.S.C. 405(g)- re #1 Complaint for Review of Social Security. Caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (alw) |
Filing 9
ORDER. Plaintiffs In Forma Pauperis Application (Dkt. #3 ) is GRANTED. Signed by US Magistrate Judge Debora K Grasham. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (alw)
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Justin Lane Martin on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security (Martin, Justin) |
| Filing 7 ALL PARTIES HAVE CONSENTED TO PROCEED BEFORE A US MAGISTRATE JUDGE(alw) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Assignment to Magistrate Judge and Requirement for Consent sent to counsel for Erin Marie Butterfield re #1 Complaint for Review of Social Security. Consent/Objection to Magistrate due by 3/3/2023. (alw) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER of Conditional Filing - caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (alw)
|
| Filing 4 PROCEDURAL ORDER SOCIAL SECURITY. Signed by US Magistrate Judge Debora K Grasham. (alw) |
| CORRECTIVE ENTRY - Pursuant to the Supplemental Rules for Social Security Review Actions Under 42 U.S.C. 405(g), the plaintiff need not serve a summons and complaint; therefore, the attached summons will not be issued.(alw) |
| Filing 3 First APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis Mark B Jones appearing for Petitioner Erin Marie Butterfield. Responses due by 3/2/2023 (Jones, Mark) |
| Filing 2 Statement of Social Security Number by Erin Marie Butterfield This is a sealed document.. (Jones, Mark) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR REVIEW OF SOCIAL SECURITY , filed by Erin Marie Butterfield. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Jones, Mark) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Butterfield v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Erin Marie Butterfield | |
| Represented By: | Mark B Jones |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Commissioner of Social Security | |
| Represented By: | Christine Gealy England |
| Represented By: | Justin Lane Martin |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
