Clyne v. Lee, et al.
Plaintiff: Heath Thomas Clyne
Defendant: Ben Lee, Seth Radiner, Jeremy Wallingford and Marisa De Long
Case Number: 3:2023cv00103
Filed: March 14, 2023
Court: US District Court for the District of Idaho
Presiding Judge: B Lynn Winmill
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 10, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 10, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER DENYING IN FORMA PAUPERIS APPLICATION - Plaintiffs Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis (Dkt. #1 ) is DENIED. Within 14 days after entry of this Order, Plaintiff must either pay the filing fee of $402.00 or present facts showing that he is in imminent danger of serious physical injury. If Plaintiff does not pay the fee and fails to establish imminent danger, the Court will dismiss this case without further notice. If Plaintiff establishes imminent danger, the Court will reconsider the Application. Signed by Judge B Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (ac)
March 14, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER of Conditional Filing - caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (swk)
March 14, 2023 Filing 4 Docket entry only - CONSENT to Magistrate Judge filed. (swk)
March 14, 2023 Filing 3 PRISONER COMPLAINT against Marisa De Long, Ben Lee, Seth Radiner, Jeremy Wallingford, filed by Heath Thomas Clyne. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Resident Concern Form(s), #2 eFile Cover Sheet)(swk)
March 14, 2023 Filing 2 Statement of Prisoner Trust Fund Account, This is a sealed document. re #1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Heath Thomas Clyne. (Attachments: #1 Accounting of Prisoner Trust)(swk)
March 14, 2023 Filing 1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Heath Thomas Clyne. Responses due by 4/4/2023 (swk)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Clyne v. Lee, et al.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Heath Thomas Clyne
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ben Lee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Seth Radiner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jeremy Wallingford
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Marisa De Long
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?