Winkler, et al. v. Payne, et al.
Michelle Kirby Winkler, Yvonne Kay Peterson, Jeremy Carroll Akdison and Jeremy Carroll Adkison |
Jeff P. Payne, Kathy M. Ackerman, Nikki Sickels, Sherri Clerk, Scott Felix Winkler, Matthew L. Jessup, Kirk MacGregor, Sunil Ramalingam, Paul Orgish, Michael Quintal, Scott Sumpter, Summer A. Emmert, Alisha Jones, Stacey Rice, Michael Chlebowski, Doug Olmer and Doug Ulmer |
3:2023cv00565 |
December 15, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Idaho |
Amanda K Brailsford |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 2, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
|
|
RECEIPT: Money Order Fee Received $ 405.00, receipt # 50834 Final Payment (dmv) |
Set Deadlines/Hearings: Status Report due by 2/28/2024. (ac) |
Filing 6 MOTION for Protective Order by Plaintiff Michelle Kirby Winkler. Responses due by 1/17/2024 (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(ac) |
Filing 5 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Jeremy Carroll Akdison. Responses due by 1/17/2024 (ac) |
Filing 4 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Yvonne Kay Peterson. Responses due by 1/17/2024 (ac) |
|
Filing 2 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Michelle Kirby Winkler. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Cover Sheet, #3 Envelope)(jd) |
Filing 1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Michelle Kirby Winkler. Responses due by 1/5/2024. (jd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.