Smith v. Idaho State of
| Lanny Smith |
| Idaho State of |
| 4:2008cv00227 |
| May 23, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of Idaho |
| Pocatello - Eastern Office |
| Bonneville - Eastern |
| Edward J. Lodge |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
146
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER The Order and Judgment previously entered in this action (Dkts. 112 , 113 ) are VACATED. Petitioner's Motion for Additional Discovery and to Release Evidence (Dkt. 138 ) is DENIED. 3. Respondent's Motions f or Extension of Time to file Answer (Dkts. 140 & 142) are GRANTED. 4. Petitioner's Second Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by Judge Edward J. Lodge. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (jp)
|
|
Filing
123
ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that, on or before 1/17/2014, Respondent Lawrence Wasden shall provide Petitioner with a copy of Detective Rodriguez's file and shall file a notice of compliance with the Clerk of Court, or show cause in a written response to this Order why he cannot provide the file. Signed by Judge Edward J. Lodge. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (st)
|
|
Filing
113
JUDGMENT that this cause of action is DISMISSED with prejudice and Petitioner shall take nothing from Respondents. Signed by Judge Edward J. Lodge. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (dks)
|
|
Filing
84
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER granting 61 Motion to File an Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus; granting 69 Motion to Expand the Record with Additional Attachments; granting 81 Motion for Leave to File Oversize Brief; dismissing without prejudice 12 Motion for Summary Judgment. The Amended Petition is deemed filed as of 8/6/2010. Respondents shall file an Answer by 5/27/2011. Petitioner shall file a Reply to the Answer by 6/24/2011. Petitioner's counsel shall submit a proposed budget ex parte and under seal by 4/22/2011. Signed by Judge Edward J. Lodge. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by cjm)
|
|
Filing
43
ORDER granting 39 Motion for Reconsideration; granting 32 Motion for discovery and additional time; Discovery ddl 6/14/10. Signed by Judge Edward J. Lodge. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by dks)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Smith v. Idaho State of | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Lanny Smith | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Idaho State of | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
