United States of America v. Custer County Idaho Board of County Commissioners et al
| United States of America |
| State of Idaho, Custer County Idaho Board of County Commissioners and Wayne F Butts |
| 4:2012cv00189 |
| April 13, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Idaho |
| Pocatello - Eastern Office |
| Custer - Eastern |
| B. Lynn Winmill |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
9
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER granting 4 Motion for TRO. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that the TRO issued above shall, unless extended, expire at the conclusion of the hearing set forth below on April 19, 2012. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that a hearing shall be held on April 19, 2012, at 9:00 a.m. in the Federal Courthouse in Pocatello Idaho to determine the TRO issued here should be extended or dissolved, or whether a preliminary injunction should issue until a final hearing on the merits. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that the BLM shall effect service of this TRO by personal service or otherwise on the defendants so that they have actual notice of the TRO as required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d)(2). Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (krb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
