Setser et al v. Idaho Home Health & Hospice/LHC Group
Jordan Setser |
Idaho Home Health & Hospice/LHC Group and Christopher Evans |
4:2012cv00444 |
August 28, 2012 |
US District Court for the District of Idaho |
Pocatello - Eastern Office |
Bannock - Eastern |
Edward J. Lodge |
Other Civil Rights |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 55 AMENDED MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER. IT IS ORDERED: Defendant LHC's Motion for Summary Judgment 28 is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART consistent with this Memorandum Decision and Order. The jury trial shall proceed on the sexual harass ment claim and Defendant LHC's alleged affirmative defense on at 9:30 a.m. on 5/13/2014 at the Federal Courthouse in Pocatello, Idaho. Defendant LHC's Motion to Strike 39 and Plaintiff Setser's Motion to Strike 43 are DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Edward J. Lodge. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (st) |
Filing 54 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 28 Motion for Summary Judgment. The jury trial shall proceed on the sexual harassment claim and Defendant LHCs alleged affirmative defense on at 9:30 a.m. on 5/13/2014 at the Federal Courthouse in Pocatello, Idaho. Signed by Judge Edward J. Lodge. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (cjm) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.