Anderson v. United Recovery Systems, LP

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit Idaho District Court Anderson v. United Recovery Systems, LP

Anderson v. United Recovery Systems, LP

Plaintiff:	Phillip L Anderson
Defendant:	United Recovery Systems, LP
Case Number:	4:2012cv00486
Filed:	September 19, 2012
Court:	US District Court for the District of Idaho
Office:	Pocatello - Eastern Office
County:	Bonneville - Eastern
Presiding Judge:	Larry M. Boyle
Nature of Suit:	Consumer Credit
Cause of Action:	15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
November 6, 2013	Filing 13 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS the Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 12 ) shall be INCORPORATED by reference and ADOPTED inits entirety. Plaintiff's Complaint (Dkt. 10 ) is DISMISSED IN ITS ENTIRETY. Plaintiff's Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis (Dkt. 9 ) is GRANTED. Plaintiff is ordered to pay $25 monthly to the Clerk of the Court on or before the last day of every month, starting in November 2013, until the balance of $350 is paid in full. Signed by Judge Edward J. Lodge. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (jp)
August 8, 2013	Filing 11 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS ; adopting 8 Report and Recommendations.; finding as moot 1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; granting 3 Motion to Seal. Signed by Judge Edward J. Lodge. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (krb)

Date Filed

Document Text

November 6, 2013

Filing 13 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS the Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 12 ) shall be INCORPORATED by reference and ADOPTED inits entirety. Plaintiff's Complaint (Dkt. 10 ) is DISMISSED IN ITS ENTIRETY. Plaintiff's Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis (Dkt. 9 ) is GRANTED. Plaintiff is ordered to pay $25 monthly to the Clerk of the Court on or before the last day of every month, starting in November 2013, until the balance of $350 is paid in full. Signed by Judge Edward J. Lodge. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (jp)

August 8, 2013

Filing 11 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS ; adopting 8 Report and Recommendations.; finding as moot 1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; granting 3 Motion to Seal. Signed by Judge Edward J. Lodge. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (krb)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Anderson v. United Recovery Systems, LP
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: United Recovery Systems, LP
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Phillip L Anderson
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?