Williams et al v. Madison County, Idaho et al
Plaintiff: Travis Williams and Amanda Williams
Defendant: Madison County, Idaho and Madison County Sheriff's Department
Case Number: 4:2012cv00561
Filed: November 9, 2012
Court: US District Court for the District of Idaho
Office: Pocatello - Eastern Office
County: Madison - Eastern
Presiding Judge: Candy W Dale
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 23, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 199 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER re 186 Motion in Limine and 187 Motion in Limine. The Court HEREBY ORDERS: Williams' Motion in Limine (Dkt. 186 ) is GRANTED in PART and DENIED in PART. Madison County's Motion in Limine (Dkt. 187 ) is GRANTED in PART and DENIED in PART. Signed by Judge David C. Nye. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (ckh)
December 3, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 118 ORDER denying 112 Motion for front pay; granting in part and denying in part 113 Motion for Attorney Fees. The Court ORDERS that Plaintiffs' counsel shall be awarded $275,000 in attorney fees and $20,819.46 in costs, for a total of $295,819.46. Signed by Judge John C. Coughenour. (klw)
February 2, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 49 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION adopting 45 Report and Recommendations; granting in part and denying in part 25 Motion for Summary Judgment. The Motion for Summary Judgment is granted on Counts IV and VIand granted in part and denied in part on Counts I, II, III, and V. Defendants Renewed Motion to Strike (Dkt. 47 ) is DENIED. The parties are directed to confer and submit a joint notice to the Court on or before 2/23/2015, indicating how they intend to proceed on the remaining claims in this case. Signed by Judge Edward J. Lodge. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (cjs)
November 18, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 44 ORDER denying 32 Motion to Strike ; denying as moot 35 Motion to Supplement. Signed by Judge Candy W. Dale. (klw)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Williams et al v. Madison County, Idaho et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Travis Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Amanda Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Madison County, Idaho
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Madison County Sheriff's Department
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?